* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050114 00:45]: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:26:52PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:19:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Also of interest is that some 1300 packages would no longer need to > > > declare a Build-Depends: at all with those changes, and another 1200 > > > wouldn't need to declare a Build-Depends-Indep:.
> > Not even versioned depends? > Not if build-essential included a suitable versioned depends, like > debhelper (>= 4). It already does that for gcc. That would still mean a versioned dependency on build-essential. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
