debian-devel:您好!何不付2天的薪水雇佣一名忠诚高效的业务员?
工作能力：一、整套的营销方案，低成本高效率。
二、任何网上可以找到的客户，我都可以联系上。
三、让更多的客户主动来点击公司的网站。
本工作室铁定是您最佳的合作伙伴，给您带来很多客户资源，我们的目标是降低公司40%的广
告成本、成为公司销售第一名。请您联系我，没有我做不到，只有我想不到，如果您没有联系
我，我不会灰心，我会继续联系您，请原谅我的坚持，因为这是我的个性。
个人简历：
姓名：创艺网络营销工作室（三亿二千万邮件地址库，邮件群发软件，信息发布软件、
Moin!
We have been offered to maintain a booth at COMDEX this November in
Las Vegas (Nov 17th - 20th) and give a talk about Debian. Alex Perry
thankfully agreed to deliver the talk but there are not enough people
to staff a booth. Two people would be needed at least.
COMDEX is provinding a tabl
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ok. BTW, are you taking into account the possibility of a package being
> uninstallable due to versioned Conflicts, and Conflicts between packages
> which otherwise satisfy a package's dependencies?
No, not yet. I will look into it.
--
Björn
RE:Sell or rent your timeshare
Do you currently own a timeshare?
Are you tired of paying high maintenence fees?
Would you like to sell or rent your Timeshare for a profit?
If so I can help you.
My site is @ http://www.eworldwholesale.com/index.php
Stop fooling around with companies that promi
order confirmation. your order should be shipped by January, via fedex.
your federal express tracking number is jura.
thank you for registering. your userid is:
antwerp
Order Prescription
Medications Online.
Shipped To Your Door OVERNIGHT! No Prescription Needed!
Click Here For In
I've already used the other solution (make www-data member of the
groups) and it works fine (I want www-data to be able to write in some
situations).
BTW I just noticed I've send this mail to debian-devel, I meant to send
it to debian-user, my apologies to anyone who felt the least bit annoyed
by
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: zope-dtmlcalendar
Version : 1.0.15
Upstream Author : Chui Tey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://zope.org/Members/teyc/CalendarTag
* License : BSD ?
Description
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:09:31 +0200, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Hello Debian policy, Ancient policy [1] frowned upon running
> > automated check of runtime behavior of packages in debian/rules to
> > save time f
* Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-08 16:25]:
> I personally sent and email to DAM asking if I should ask again for
> sponsor or if should I wait to become a developer and I got no
> answer.
Actually, you did get an answer, on day after sending your mail.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
fam (of which I am the maintainer) stopped working properly on PPC (see
the bug report from the subject). I suspect this has something to do
with the way glibc handles SIGRT* signals. As of libc6 2.3.1 I head to
link fam against -lrt and -lpthread for those signals to work, and it
did work.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
| My first goal is to persuade developers that running tests is
| worthwhile. For the implentation I have mainly 3 questions:
|
| 1) Do porters and autobuilders admins want to be able to skip the tests ?
Surely skipping the tests on
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:25:34PM +0200, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fam (of which I am the maintainer) stopped working properly on PPC (see
> the bug report from the subject). I suspect this has something to do
> with the way glibc handles SIGRT* signals. As of libc6 2.3.1 I head to
> link
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this should be clearly discussed.
> Original link at:
> http://www.advogato.org/article/716.html
>
>
> Debian and Democracy
> Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
>
> me "you need to get 5 sponsors blah blah" I found 4, but they scared out
> every 5
On 08-Oct-03, 15:40 (CDT), Moray Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed. Why do you assume that there would be Debian-specific documents?
> [snip]
> Indeed. Why do you assume there would be info documents?
> [snip]
I think he was just noting that he'd looked in all the different typical
plac
On 09-Oct-03, 07:49 (CDT), Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> | 3) Do we want to allow for autorecovery ? If gcc -O2 leads to a broken
> | binary, why not set up debian/rules to automatically retry with gcc
> | -O0 ?
>
>
Op do 09-10-2003, om 14:15 schreef Bill Allombert:
> My first goal is to persuade developers that running tests is
> worthwhile. For the implentation I have mainly 3 questions:
>
> 1) Do porters and autobuilders admins want to be able to skip the tests ?
Not me. Running regression tests is (very)
(in the interest of openness...)
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:06:46AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think this should be clearly discussed.
> > Original link at:
> > http://www.advogato.org/article/716.html
> >
> > Debian and Democracy
> > Posted 7
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 04:33:16PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The benefits of not running regression tests at build time (saving a
> considerable amount of time) do, IMO, not outweigh the disadvantages
Reading that, I wonder if we should rethink our build system. Currently on
release we ship
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> (e) I've heard about a "debtags" database system that's trying to
> find a general solution to the problem of categorizing packages.
> I took a look at their library at one point and wasn't able to
> figure out how to use it, but if this project is still going
>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:18AM +0200, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> I've already used the other solution (make www-data member of the
> groups) and it works fine (I want www-data to be able to write in some
> situations).
> BTW I just noticed I've send this mail to debian-devel, I meant to send
> it
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> My first goal is to persuade developers that running tests is
> worthwhile. For the implentation I have mainly 3 questions:
>
> 1) Do porters and autobuilders admins want to be able to skip the tests ?
As a porter: No. Dear god, n
On Tuesday, Oct 7, 2003, at 15:07 US/Eastern, martin f krafft wrote:
Alright, I give you that. But it works.
Sort of. I routinely have to fight it on my IPSec gateway. It really
doesn't like some of the things I do with (to?) it. I understand the
new IPSec stack is supposed to be much better and
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:15:03 +0200, Bill Allombert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> My first goal is to persuade developers that running tests is
> worthwhile. For the implentation I have mainly 3 questions:
> 1) Do porters and autobuilders admins want to be able to skip the
>tests ?
i) This
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:59:15PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> (e) I've heard about a "debtags" database system that's trying to
> find a general solution to the problem of categorizing packages.
> I took a look at their library at one point and wasn't able to
> figure out h
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:49:13PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> | My first goal is to persuade developers that running tests is
> | worthwhile. For the implentation I have mainly 3 questions:
> |
> | 1) Do porters and autobuil
> Look at the debian dir of the package you are backporting. ;)
> Hint - k3b-0.9/debian/patches/02_k3bcdparanoialib.dpatch
My fault: i did not do a backport. I just build a woody package from
pure upstream sources... But thank you for the hint.
Henning
Hey you guys, I need some help here from the gurus.
I've found that kernel 2.4.21 has no soundcore.o, at
least after googling it seems to be a general problem.
I posted a message to the users list about it last
night, but I haven't got any help.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-
[CCing debian-x because if I get hit by a bus or arrested by Secretary
Ashcroft today, the following will be important for the inheritor of our
XFree86 packages to know.]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:20:01AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just answer t
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:06:46AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> I will admit I was one of the four sponsors, based on my theory that
> the best way to make someone be nice, is to be nice to them, as what
> goes around comes around. Golden rule and all that.
>
> In retrospect, perhaps that tech
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > Are gcc optimiser bugs really that common?
>
> No. While they certainly do exist, >99% of the time, if code works at
> -O0 but not at -O2, then the code is broken. (Of course, there are
> specific optimization operations that req
Em Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:08:06 +0100, Tom Badran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sunday 05 October 2003 15:45, Tom wrote:
> > I disagree. GUI apps in Linux are so wildly disparate that knowing the
> > basic architecture is pretty important for me to decide whether or not I
> > want it.
>
> I sec
On 09-Oct-03, 13:00 (CDT), Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > No. While they certainly do exist, >99% of the time, if code works at
> > -O0 but not at -O2, then the code is broken.
>
> I find this difficult to swallow
Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:08:22 +0300
> Source: ssystem
> Binary: ssystem
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.6-14.1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Changed-By: Konstantinos Margariti
Am Do, den 09.10.2003 schrieb Branden Robinson um 05:17:
> http://people.debian.org/~rene/exa-log-24-07-2003
Just wanted to thank rene for recording that, it was a interesting
reading for the evening, and certainly better than German TV. I
especially like these parts:
15:39 * Madkiss grins
15:39
On Thursday 09 October 2003 23:16, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Heh? Please read section 5.11 of the Developer's Reference about
> non-maintainer uploads[1]. You're not supposed to set yourself as
> the Maintainer in the uploaded package; if you did that so that the
> bug is closed instead of being
On 09-Oct-03, 14:48 (CDT), Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GCC may, in fact, be more likely to have optimization bugs than, say,
> the old DEC Fortran compiler.
Looking at the other replies, I see this turns out to be the case, esp.
on non-x86. So apparently it falls into the
> [1]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:16:29PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Changed-By: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> Heh? Please read section 5.11 of the Developer's Reference about
> non-maint
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> IIRC maximum number is limited to 32 groups for a single user. Just in
> case you are going to add more :)
What happens if you exceed this limit?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:37:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Whether there were other potential "5th sponsors" that were dissuaded,
> I couldn't say.
I considered it, as the first indications I recieved (from going through
mailing list archives) was that he was no more abrasive than others on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdvb
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Marcus Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.metzlerbros.org/dvb/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : library to tune and command DVB cards
This library
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:36 AM
Subject: The SPI/Debian trademark committee
> My god, that was awful. They still haven't fixed cpp -traditional, as
> far as I know. Grumble grumble grumble.
Bug number?
zw
42 matches
Mail list logo
