Em Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:08:06 +0100, Tom Badran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sunday 05 October 2003 15:45, Tom wrote: > > I disagree. GUI apps in Linux are so wildly disparate that knowing the > > basic architecture is pretty important for me to decide whether or not I > > want it. > > I second that, i consider that a very good guideline for how likely a package > is going to integrate well with a particular DE. It also allows me to quickly > determine that some package will have a major cascading dependency tree that > i may or may not have installed. I also frequently will do a search for say > "kde mail client" or such like and having kde/gtk/whatever in the description > helps greatly on this. I agree, and I believe it might be a good idea to have 'kde' or 'gnome' mentioned on the detailed description. But I am also being convinced that it is not good to have those things writen into the short description. I'll have to rething some of my packages' short descriptions, but I think that'll improve Debian's usability for the new comers. I usually search for 'gtk stuff' too, but that'll match the long description, and I usually find out the toolkit by looking at the depends, anyway, so. Thanks for bringing this point up, debacle. []s! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org> "Não deixe para amanhã, o WML que você pode traduzir hoje!" http://debian-br.alioth.debian.org/?id=WebWML
