商业源码

2003-09-26 Thread hhd
商业源码大量出售~ 13939384808 http://www.kj8.con.cn/ QQ:271530330 E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#212807: ITP: cvsreport -- Extract activity reports from a CVS repository

2003-09-26 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-26 Severity: wishlist * Package name: cvsreport Version : 0.3.3 Upstream Author : Vincent Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/cvsreport/ * License : GPL Description : Extract activit

[PATCH] 2.2 kernel bug in utimes() and its results (m4 FTBFS, coreutils breakage, etc.)

2003-09-26 Thread viro
First of all, apologies for posting here. Use of BTS would lead to too many bug reassignments in that case ;-/ Summary: there is a bug in 2.2 kernels that leads to breakage of glibc 2.3.2 on 2.2 boxen, to breakage of coreutils and to FTBFS of m4 on alpha. Additionally, there's a

Re: Virus emails

2003-09-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:05:54AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Wouter Verhelst dijo [Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:03:39AM +0200]: > > > I don't think so - And if so, this could break many client MTAs. > > > According to the protocol definition [1], > > > > [...] > > >

Re: Virus emails

2003-09-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:44:50PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Daniel Burrows dijo [Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:10:57PM -0400]: > > > And I insist... Do you want to stop every mail which is (peeking at my > > > inbox) between 1887 and 2183 bytes long just because it migh

免费注册,再送88元给您的朋友!

2003-09-26 Thread 中国家庭旅馆网
注册中国家庭旅馆网,送88元!   家--是人生温馨的港湾。对于因出差、旅游而奔波在外的人们来说,家只能是遥远的期盼。昂贵的宾馆饭店,嘈杂的招待所,都曾经是出行者无奈的居所。   家庭旅馆的兴起打破了客居服务市场的单一格局,为临时生活在异乡的人们提供了新的选择。   但各具特色的家庭旅馆正空以待客,而旅行者也不知道下一个"家"在哪里。"中国家庭旅馆网"为店家和房客架起了信息的桥梁。   免费登记,免费查询,方便你我他。   现在起以"房客"身份注册,还可获得首次入住"阳光移动公寓"

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:00:42 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: This package contains material licensed under the GNU FDL (the manual) installed in usr/share/info/make.info*.gz. Debian-legal has determined that the GNU FDL is not a free software licens

重要文件

2003-09-26 Thread 宋生
至贵公司财务部: > > > > > > 你好!广州市荣泰贸易有限公司,是一家制造及销售为一体的责任公司,本公司由于业务不足,现有剩余普通商品销售发票代开,点数较底,如贵公司在进项或出项方面有需要,可来电联系或咨询: > > > > > > > > > 13570401554 > > > 宋先生 > > > > > > 祝

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Manoj Srivastava wrote: Don't bother reopening these reports, they shall be just as summarily closed. Feel free to modify the severity; I simply set it according to policy to start with. :-P There's nothing wrong with asking upstream to change its license (and I wish you luck). The si

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:41:53 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Don't bother reopening these reports, they shall be just as >> summarily closed. > Feel free to modify the severity; I simply set it according to > policy to start with. :-P I di

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:20:21 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Hi, On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:00:42 -0400, Nathanael Nerode >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> This package contains material licensed under the GNU FDL (the >>> manual) installed in usr/share/i

Re: kernel-source == Linux or Hurd or ???

2003-09-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * martin f krafft [Mon, Sep 22 2003, 08:03:18PM]: > This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel > independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux? > > I think we should rename to linux-kernel-source, linux-kernel-image > and so on... Good point. The idea is not n

Re: The size of debian packages

2003-09-26 Thread Daniel Serpell
El Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 12:15:49AM +0100, Bruce Stephens escribio: > > This script shows installed packages together with their installed > size: > > #!/bin/sh > gawk 'BEGIN {RS=""; FS="\n"} > $2~/ installed/ { > split($1, pkg, " "); > split($5, size, " ")

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 212525 tags 212525 sarge-ignore thanks On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:20:21 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity, > and is very useful to mainta

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity, > and is very useful to maintainers who need advice on licensing > issues. And I shall stipulate that there is a rough consensus on > debian-legal about the GFDL. Right. There is co

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:40:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I did. I feel my packages are not buggy, lacking a position > statement by the project. So, what we ship in main shall not be a function of whether the works in it are DFSG-free or not, but shall instead depend on whether o

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread Chad Walstrom
martin f krafft wrote: MFK> make-kpkg and kernel-patches/modules work just fine with vanilla MFK> sources. Matt Zimmerman wrote: MDZ> Except with --initrd. Doesn't this have to do with the cramfs patch? Wasn't this patch rejected by Linus for some reason? IIRC, the cramfs patch is something ver

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
martin f krafft wrote: >also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.22.1= >320 +0200]: >> It would be inappropriate to do it within a stable release, sure, >> but it is something that Debian do do in general. In this case >> it's a chunk of code that has almost nothing to do with the c

Re: Resolvconf -- a package to manage /etc/resolv.conf

2003-09-26 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 20:25, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I have a laptop that sometimes is on fixed ip wireless > networks. Since dhcp is not involved, there is nothing that updates > resolvconf, which could be pointing to an inaccurate set of servers. If you bring the interface up with ifup

Bug#212914: ITP: arptables -- ARP table administration

2003-09-26 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: arptables Version : 0.0.2 Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ebtables.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : ARP table administration Arptables is used to set up, m

Re: Horrific new levels of changelog abuse

2003-09-26 Thread Herbert Xu
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Totally equivalent when we're discussing about closure messages sent >> to -done. > > A message to -done means nothing to anyone except the bug submitter. The > three seconds I spend writing a useful changelog entry make it useful to me, > the submit

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread Herbert Xu
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a particular reason we are distributing old kernels at all? I > see the following in the archive: They're needed by non-i386 architectures. Once a kernel-source is no longer used by any architecture, it can be removed from Debian. > BTW - li

Re: Bug#192101: We need gnucash in stable

2003-09-26 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, sorry to bug you again, and for "escalating" this to debian-devel, but something needs to be done. For those just joining us: gnucash (the probably most complete wand fit-for-real-use financing program in debian) is not in testing for sarge at all. While the package works very well for all us

Re: Debian RC System/Init Scripts

2003-09-26 Thread Steve Greenland
On 24-Sep-03, 20:48 (CDT), Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please don't denounce my efforts as "Debian doesn't need parallel > starts!" Because I'd like to make it for myself, regardless what Debian > needs. > > Anyways, mandated inclusion of lines such as DESC, NAME, etc in the > scrip

RFS: gnat 3.15p

2003-09-26 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Folks, I have packaged GNAT 3.15p for Debian, and would like someone to sponsor the package for me. The source package creates 2 binary packages; gnat and libgnat-3.15p-1. The packages are signed with my GPG key, which is in keys.debian.org (it has been signed by a Debian Developer). The packag

RFS: gnat-doc -- Documentation for the GNU Ada compiler

2003-09-26 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have package the documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which comes in a separate upstream package. The package is available on my repository, and is signed with my GPG key. My GPG key is on keys.debian.org, and it has been signed by a Debian Developer. My repository is at: deb http://www.ada-france.

Bug#212924: ITP: amule -- aNOTHER eMule P2P Client ...

2003-09-26 Thread Julien Delange
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: amule Version : 1.0.6 * Upstream Author : Stephane COLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://amule.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : aNOTHER eMule P2P Client ... aMule stand for another eMule fil

Re: killing virus e-mails with file types

2003-09-26 Thread Richard Braakman
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:20:22PM -0500, Craig P. Steffen wrote: > I do it in an even simpler way (keep in mind I don't really have bandwidth > limitations). I have my mail filter (kmail) set up so it trashes any mail > message with the string ".exe", ".pif", ".bat", or ".scr". So presumably

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.25.0044 +0200]: > I'm perfectly willing to bet that more of our users are interested > in a functional ipsec stack than are interested in the grsecurity > patch. I am not opposing having a patch provide that stack. > >"it's a chunk of code

RFS: gnat-glade -- Distributed Systems Annex for GNAT (GNU Ada 95 compiler)

2003-09-26 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged gnat-glade and am looking for a sponsor for this package. The sources and binaries are available from my repository, and are signed with my GPG key which is on keys.debian.org and has been signed by a Debian developer. My repository is at: deb http://www.ada-france.org/debian ad

Re: Horrific new levels of changelog abuse

2003-09-26 Thread Mathieu Roy
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Totally equivalent when we're discussing about closure messages sent > >> to -done. > > > > A message to -done means nothing to anyone except the bug submitter. The > > three seconds I spend writing a

RFS: gnat-glade-doc -- GNAT Distributed Systems Annex documentation

2003-09-26 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged gnat-glade-doc and am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages into unstable. The source and binary packages are available from my repository. They have been signed by my GPG key, which is on keys.debian.org and has been signed by a Debian developer. My repository is at: deb

RFS: asis -- Ada Semantic Interface Specification

2003-09-26 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have packaged asis, the Ada Semantic Interface Specification. This source package produces 3 binary packages: asis-programs, libasis-3.15p-1, and libasis-3.15p-1-dev. All packages, source and binary, are available on my repository, and are signed with my GPG key. This key is on keys.debian.or

Timeout of ITP's

2003-09-26 Thread Søren Boll Overgaard
Hi, An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in June. Since then, for various reasons, no package has been uploaded, and someone other then the original submitter of the ITP has committed to uploading a package. However, nothing has happened for nearly a month now, and

Re: To what extent should Debian modify the kernel? (Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!)

2003-09-26 Thread Herbert Xu
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I ran it through diffstat, and removed the files which are created entirely by > the patch, so these are the changes to common code: I've had a look and it appears to be acceptable. Please file a bug report against kernel and I'll probably include it

Re: The size of debian packages

2003-09-26 Thread Scott James Remnant
(CC'd as I'm not positive you're subscribed to this list) On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 22:34, Andrew Lyon wrote: > Since installing Debian in May the amount of disk space required for my OS > has risen from 1.5GB to 3GB and has reached the limit of the partition. > I don't really want to allocate any

Re: Timeout of ITP's

2003-09-26 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote: > An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in Your footnotes are dangling. -- Glenn Maynard

Re: [cjwatson@debian.org: Re: Fwd: Processing of ferret_3.0-2_i386.changes]

2003-09-26 Thread Brian White
> > SCP doesn't work (I suspect) because I'm using the "SSH2" package once > > found in non-free. > > Oh, ssh2 is broken, yes. Try 'scp -1', perhaps? I don't keep ssh1 installed for security reasons. > > I mentioned this (and the reasons why) some time back. > > Care to reiterate? I can't re

Re: apt-proxy/wget/squid caches file indefinitely

2003-09-26 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:11:37 +1000 Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, this is driving me bananas. I go to download the latest > unstable packages, only to find that apt-get update > has just retrieved a cached copy of the Packages file that > (in some cases) can be a month old. I've seen s

Re: Debian RC System/Init Scripts

2003-09-26 Thread Jerry Haltom
Good point. Statement not thought out well. I have no excuse. :D On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 08:16, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 24-Sep-03, 20:48 (CDT), Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please don't denounce my efforts as "Debian doesn't need parallel > > starts!" Because I'd like to make it

Re: boot problem : snort starts too soon

2003-09-26 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 05:52:59PM +0200, Timothy Demulder wrote: > Hi, > > Could it be possible to start snort at a later time in the bootprocess? > I'm asking this because ppp starts S14 and snort starts S20. > Point is, pppd call takes a couple of seconds to negotiate an > ip with the ISP so s

Re: netsaint

2003-09-26 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:36:07AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > > I've been EXTREAMLY busy so I haven't even LOOKED at my 'debian bugs mail > folders'! A quick look reveals that I have 112 mails in there that haven't > been taken care of. > > Things is getting calmer every day, and hopfully

Re: The size of debian packages

2003-09-26 Thread Andrew Joseph Lyon
Thanks for that Scott. It works very nicely. Regards Andy

Re: The size of debian packages

2003-09-26 Thread Richard Braakman
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:34:31PM +0100, Andrew Lyon wrote: > How can I find out the sizes of the > packages and try to establish what I can remove without disaster. I tried > using deborphan to do this but it didn't even put a dent in my 100% full > volume. I was faced with a similar problem s

Re: killing virus e-mails with file types

2003-09-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Craig P. Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.23.1745 +0200]: > I do it in an even simpler way (keep in mind I don't really have > bandwidth limitations). I have my mail filter (kmail) set up so > it trashes any mail message with the string ".exe", ".pif", > ".bat", or ".scr". So yo

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread martin f krafft
This thread has been going on for a while, and I think the general voice has been that security backports and other vital patches are totally alright for kernel-source. However, I think the general agreement is that feature backports are not okay. That's what kernel-patches are for. I would like t

Re: Limit on the number of users in a group?

2003-09-26 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 13:54, Ondrej Hrebicek wrote: > Hi, > > when a group in /etc/group contains over a 100 > members, chgrp stops functioning properly when a > numeric group ID is passed as an argument. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:anthony$ querybts 208428 212541 Querying Debian bug tracking system

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:14:03 -0400, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:50PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: >> also sprach Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.22.1343 +0200]: >> > However, they might be useful to people using make-kpkg and patch >> > packa

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Friday, 26 Sep 2003 09:43:26 -0500, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:20:21 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s > >I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity, >

[no subject]

2003-09-26 Thread Harlan Blackstone
I downloaded a graphics driver for an Hp 6545C, I think, Pavillion.  It is on a CD and a floppy.  How do you get it to intall.  I don't how to find the path name.  can you help   Harlan J. Blackstone, M.D.

[no subject]

2003-09-26 Thread Harlan Blackstone
I have debian 3.0 and I am having trouble finding a driver for a Hp Pavillion6545C with a chipset of intel.  I may have found one but it won't install.  Can you tell me the correct driver and how do you find the pathname to install it.  Mine won't install.     Thank you,   Harlan J. Blackston

AMENIZAMOS TODO TIPO DE EVENTOS

2003-09-26 Thread Zamusic
VISITA ALGUNO DE NUESTROS SITIOS http://mx.geocities.com/eventos_soci http://mx.geocities.com/angelclasico http://eventos.topcities.com EVENTOS SOCIALES Amenizamos cualquier tipo de eventos sociales. Contamos con la mas alta calidad de agrupaciones musicales Tu evento será recordado como el

Re: [PATCH] 2.2 kernel bug in utimes() and its results (m4 FTBFS, coreutils breakage, etc.)

2003-09-26 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, wrote: > 5) Why does lully (or any of buildd boxen) run 2.2? (as it apparently does) > Seeing that sarge is hopefully going to be 2.4-based... I will coordinate with debian-admin, for getting lully upgraded, if they want to do so.

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-26 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:47:13PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote: > Doesn't this have to do with the cramfs patch? Man, this is quite the delay. I guess that's what I get for misconfiguring my email server with the wrong origin setting. ;-) -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www

Re: Bug#212525: Package contains non-free GNU FDL material

2003-09-26 Thread Brian Nelson
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:40:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> I did. I feel my packages are not buggy, lacking a position >> statement by the project. > > So, what we ship in main shall not be a function of whether the works in > it are D