On Apr 20, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>why not use this trick also for posts to debian mailing lists?
Because it's *fucking annoying*?
--
ciao, |
Marco | [526 cuRlJMlIVOiyY]
On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add themselves
>by sending a mail in certain format to something like
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Only after that would mail from that address be
>accepted without bouncing. That shou
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 10:53:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:09:41PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > BTW the opinion of this jumped-up developer is "please don't send me
> > > private copies of posts to mailing lists". Thanks.
> >
> > Apologies,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:46:03AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add
> >themselves by sending a mail in certain format to something like
> >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Only after that w
Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
>
> On one of my servers, apache segfaults when php4 loads the
> imap.so module.
> I have a few servers with similar versions, and only one of
> the servers
> experiences the segfault.
Check incoming in an hour or two. Or your local mirror around this time
tomor
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I followed Release Managers request on how to deal with the libvorbis
> mess, if you have a problem with how it was dealt with bring it up on
> irc. You should know this already but a message was sent out a week in
> advance to the libvorbis breakage occu
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 01:01:45AM +0200, Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
> Hi.
> On one of my servers, apache segfaults when php4 loads the imap.so module.
> I have a few servers with similar versions, and only one of the servers
> experiences the segfault.
> I am unable to discover the cause of
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:21:27 -0500
> > This doesn't work for texmf.cnf which also I told you once before.
>
> And why does it not?
>
> > If the default is to keep your current ve
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - cvsd/listen:
>s/cvsd will listen on/on which cvsd will listen/
> # Avoid dangling preposition
This is an English usage question of the sort that will get the
English and Linguistics departments at some universities to start
leaving nasty notes
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: stop the "manage with debconf" madness
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 02:58:10 -0500
> > (on the whole) try to make the best job they can of the packaging
> > of their programs.
>
> Anyone can make mistakes.
Yes and you can too, further pol
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:24:47 -0500
> > Note users can add local modification freely with the current
> > method, please read README.Debian.
>
> But an admin may no longer freely s
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:57:41 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: stop the
> "manage with debconf" madness Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 02:58:10 -0500
>> > (on the whole) try to make the best job they can of the packaging
>> >
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:08:04 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant) Date: Fri, 18 Apr
> 2003 12:24:47 -0500
>> > Note users can add local modification freely with the cu
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:40:16 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant) Date: Fri, 18 Apr
> 2003 12:21:27 -0500
>> > This doesn't work for texmf.cnf which also I told you on
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:02:19PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> >Um, no. *Policy* says that it may not be used as a registry.
> [SNIPPED LONG DIATRIBE THAT DOES NOT PROVE THE ABOVE STATEMENT]
> Sure, you delete the registry things should still work. Did I say anything
> different? You are making a
(Multiply replies collapsed and addressed)
Years ago, NeXT modified GCC and the rest of the GNU tools to allow
them to produce multi-architecture binaries, so that a single binary
executable could run on both 68k and i386 platforms. They also had a
tool that could strip out hunks for unwanted arch
It is really a question of, do you respect the authors?
Stallman never imagined that anyone in the free software business would
be other than a gentleman. Then the OS rather than just the kernel got
named Linux by those who found his politics inconvenient to their
business, and the k got drop
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 06:54:42AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> It is really a question of, do you respect the authors?
It's really much simpler than that. The package maintainer changed
something that you didn't like, in an unreleased package in the unstable
distribution (this version of the so
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 06:54:42AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> It is really a question of, do you respect the authors?
Not much, after that lengthly diatribe which *still* fails to clearly
state what the perceived problem is.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:52:43 -0500
> > Sorry to say but I should say that you don't have enough knowledge
> > about TeX system.
>
> Ah, pissing contest. OK, I have been building TeX
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 10:41:08PM -0400, Shantonu Sen wrote:
> >reduce the burden on the autobuilders;
>
> Using cross building like this would indeed allow a farm of x86
> machines to compile all architectures, instead of needing to support
> lots of builder types, which may or may not be as s
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:57:11 -0500
> > I don't understand why you say "an admin may no longer freely
> > synchronize the conffile"?
>
> I used to have TeX on 27 machines, including
In chiark.mail.debian.devel, Hans Reiser wrote:
>Feel free to make the credits more CPU efficient, reformat them to fit a
>screen, animate them, anything that adheres to the academic attribution
>spirit of respecting those who contributed years of their lives at the
>cost of substantial reducti
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 06:54:42AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> It is really a question of, do you respect the authors?
Who do you respect, Hans? Many Debian Developers are also Free Software
authors. How much respect are you showing us with your brazen
accusations of impropriety? Did it occur
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:52:43 -0500
> > Without the current cheme all TeX system breaks so, in short, the
> > new scheme is indispensable infrastructure for TeX system and there
> > is no c
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Feel free to make the credits more CPU efficient, reformat them to fit a
> screen, animate them, anything that adheres to the academic attribution
> spirit of respecting those who contributed years of their lives at the
> cost of substantial reductions i
At Sun, 20 Apr 2003 08:55:11 +0200,
Markus Amersdorfer wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:04:01 +0200
> Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:49AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library
> > > invol
What if the full statment was shown once on installation, but not every
time the program is used, would that be an acceptable compromise to you ?
Glenn
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
