From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:52:43 -0500
> > Without the current cheme all TeX system breaks so, in short, the > > new scheme is indispensable infrastructure for TeX system and there > > is no choice other than to accept to the new scheme. > > Rubbish. You could have let the old system remain, and posted > a high priority note saying that replace the config files with > *.dpkg-new or else TeX shall break. Let the human make the > decision. With a manual merge, perhaps the admin would carry changes > over. In this point, I was very confused. I have an impression that someone said that we should remark with debconf and others said that it was abuse of debconf. What is the correct understanding? At present, I reserved the old texmf.cnf as texmf.cnf.dpkg-old and expalin how to merge local modifications to the new scheme in README.Debian without using debconf. Thanks, 2003-4-21(Mon) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
