Davide Prina writes:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 21/02/2012 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
>> I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
>> own files.
>
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> * some packages are in T and P but with different versions (libace-6.0.1);
> * some packages have more versions in T than in P (eog-plugins);
I can not confirm these two specific packages. However, the importer of
translations into U
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 18:53 +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found one);
> * some packages are in T, but not in P (lib32z1);
Which architectu
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> >I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
> >own files.
>
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in P, but not in T
Hi Ian,
On 21/02/2012 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
own files.
Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
understand that there are correct:
* some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found
5 matches
Mail list logo
