Bug#995840: ITP: golang-github-vmware-vmw-ovflib --

2021-10-06 Thread Dominik George
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominik George * Package name: golang-github-vmware-vmw-ovflib Version : 0.0~git20200204.53a0e9f-1 Upstream Author : VMware, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/vmware/vmw-ovflib * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go

Bug#995762: ITP: golang-github-vmware-vmw-guestinfo --

2021-10-05 Thread Dominik George
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominik George * Package name: golang-github-vmware-vmw-guestinfo Version : 0.0~git20200218.687661b-1 Upstream Author : VMware * URL : https://github.com/vmware/vmw-guestinfo * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go

Bug#994904: general: Wayland-Gnome-freeze in VMware when automatic ungrab while scrolling

2021-09-22 Thread Volker Jung
Package: general Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: volker.j...@flexible-solutions.de Dear Maintainer, I installed Debian 11 in VMware Player 16.1.2 build-17966106 running on Windows 10. Most things are fine, tools are automatically installed. While working I discovered random freezes of the gnome

Bug#969263: closed by Chris Hofstaedtler (Re: Bug#969263: bugs.debian.org: debian 10 does not let me install vmware tools)

2020-08-30 Thread Paul Flaherty
ot let me install vmware tools) This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the general package: #969263: bugs.debian.org: debian 10 does not let me install vmware tools It has been closed by Chris Hofstaedtler . Their explanation is attached below along wit

Bug#969263: closed by Chris Hofstaedtler (Re: Bug#969263: bugs.debian.org: debian 10 does not let me install vmware tools)

2020-08-30 Thread Paul Flaherty
an.org: debian 10 does not let me install vmware tools) This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the general package: #969263: bugs.debian.org: debian 10 does not let me install vmware tools It has been closed by Chris Hofstaedtler . Their explanation is at

Re: Bug#926229: New QoS defaults break systems running on VMWare

2019-04-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:32:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > If it were just the VMware issue, then my inclination would be to leave > OpenSSH as it is: it's proprietary software and the only leverage we > have to get them to fix it is to have their customers complaining. A V

Re: Bug#926229: New QoS defaults break systems running on VMWare

2019-04-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:27:47PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > This is related, but not the same as [1] and about the new defaults in > regard to QoS. > Due to upstream change [2] the new defaults now mean that ssh is > broken if connecting to (or through) a system runni

VMware contact list

2017-04-21 Thread dolores . kim
Hi, Would you be interested in acquiring VMware contact list for marketing or email campaign? We can segment Industry List & Technology Users List by C-level, VP-level, Director-Level and Manager Level as per your requirements. We also have alternative Technology such as: Hyp

Bug#855680: ITP: golang-github-vmware-photon-controller-go-sdk -- VMware Photon Controller API library

2017-02-20 Thread Potter, Tim
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tim Potter * Package name: golang-github-vmware-photon-controller-go-sdk Version : 0.0~PROMOTED-339-1 Upstream Author : VMware, Inc. * URL

Bug#837520: RFP: vagrant-vsphere -- VMWare vSphere provider for Vagrant

2016-09-12 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/vagrant-vsphere.git Description: VMWare vSphere provider for Vagrant vSphere provider for Vagrant, allowing Vagrant to control and provision machines using VMware. New machines are created from virtual machines or templates which

Bug#805369: ITP: vmware-nsx -- VMware NSX SDN plugin for OpenStack Neutron

2015-11-17 Thread James Page
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: vmware-nsx Version : 1.0.0 * URL : http://github.com/openstack/vmware-nsx * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : VMware NSX SDN plugin for OpenStack Neutron VMware

Bug#792348: ITP: libvmdk -- VMWare Virtual Disk format access library

2015-07-13 Thread Hilko Bengen
Control: block 792335 by -1 Package: wnpp Owner: Hilko Bengen Severity: wishlist * Package name: libvmdk Version : 20150516 Upstream Author : Joachim Metz * URL or Web page : https://github.com/libyal/libvmdk * License : LGPL-3.0+ Description : VMWare Virtual Disk

Bug#758745: ITP: python-pyvmomi -- Python bindings for the VMware vSphere Web Services SDK

2014-08-20 Thread Joshua Kwan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joshua Kwan X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-pyvmomi Version : 5.5.0-2014.1 Upstream Author : Shawn Hartsock * URL : https://github.com/vmware/pyvmomi * License : Apache Programming

Bug#740806: ITP: python-oslo.vmware -- VMware library for OpenStack projects

2014-03-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
: VMware library for OpenStack projects This package is part of the Oslo project, which aims at providing unified Python libraries across all of OpenStack. It provides a VMware library for OpenStack projects. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#738325: ITP: python-pyvmomi -- VMware vSphere Python SDK

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-pyvmomi Version : 5.5.0 Upstream Author : Parth Gala * URL : https://github.com/vmware/pyvmomi * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : VMware vSphere

Processed: Re: Bug#711477: general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation

2013-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 711477 gstreamer0.10 Bug #711477 [general] general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gstreamer0.10'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #71

Bug#711477: general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation

2013-12-09 Thread Holger Levsen
t; cause by running as a VMware client On Freitag, 7. Juni 2013, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Package: general > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've installed Debian 7 as a guest OS in VMware 9.0.2, which is running in > a Gentoo Linux AMD64 host. Trying t

Bug#711477: general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation

2013-06-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo What is your x server ? Le 7 juin 2013 09:15, "Nikos Chantziaras" a écrit : > Package: general > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've installed Debian 7 as a guest OS in VMware 9.0.2, which is running in > a > Gentoo

Processed: Re: Bug#711477: general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation

2013-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #711477 [general] general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 711477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711477 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Bug#711477: general: Videos are not visible in VMware Workstation

2013-06-07 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Package: general Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I've installed Debian 7 as a guest OS in VMware 9.0.2, which is running in a Gentoo Linux AMD64 host. Trying to play videos in any software that uses GStreamer results in the audio being played normally, but the video is not visible. Inste

Re: Debian 5.0 support for VMware ESX 3.5/4.0/ESXi 4.1

2012-02-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, February 15, 2012 16:40, Piotrek P wrote: > Dear All, > Please be aware that VMware ESX 3.5 is NOT supporting any of Debian as > Guest OS. > Please be aware that VMware ESXi 4.1 IS supporting Debian 4.0, 5.0 as > Guest OS. > Please be aware that VMware ESX 5.0 IS supporti

Re: Debian 5.0 support for VMware ESX 3.5/4.0/ESXi 4.1

2012-02-15 Thread Mathieu Parent
Le 15 février 2012 16:40, Piotrek P a écrit : > Dear All, Hi, > Please be aware that VMware ESX 3.5 is NOT supporting any of Debian as Guest > OS. > Please be aware that VMware ESXi 4.1 IS supporting Debian 4.0, 5.0 as Guest > OS. > Please be aware that VMware ESX 5.0 IS sup

Re: Debian 5.0 support for VMware ESX 3.5/4.0/ESXi 4.1

2012-02-15 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:40:03 +0100 Piotrek P wrote: > Dear All, > Please be aware that VMware ESX 3.5 is NOT supporting any of Debian > as Guest OS. Please be aware that VMware ESXi 4.1 IS supporting > Debian 4.0, 5.0 as Guest OS. Please be aware that VMware ESX 5.0 IS

Debian 5.0 support for VMware ESX 3.5/4.0/ESXi 4.1

2012-02-15 Thread Piotrek P
Dear All, Please be aware that VMware ESX 3.5 is NOT supporting any of Debian as Guest OS. Please be aware that VMware ESXi 4.1 IS supporting Debian 4.0, 5.0 as Guest OS. Please be aware that VMware ESX 5.0 IS supporting Debian 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 as Guest OS. I would like to ask: - What does it means

Bug#617630: ITP: vmware-manager -- Manage VMware virtual machines

2011-03-09 Thread Alexander Zangerl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Zangerl * Package name: vmware-manager Version : n/a (github-hosted, will arrange suitable version tags with upstream) Upstream Author : Matt Carter * URL : https://github.com/hash-bang/VMM * License : GPL

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:04:44PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote: > > > Thanks a lot, that's already good enough for me. Please tell me, > > ...but please don't tell debian-devel. (MFT set) > Sorry, but I really can't get it. He means that this has nothing to do with Debian development, so the appropria

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/10/2010 08:04 PM, Tong Sun wrote: > > Thanks a lot, that's already good enough for me. Please tell me, > > ...but please don't tell debian-devel. (MFT set) Sorry, but I really can't get it. All over the web, people from other distros are sharing how they can beat it, but I just can't fi

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-10 Thread Tong Sun
> > Thanks a lot, that's already good enough for me. Please tell me, > > ...but please don't tell debian-devel. (MFT set) Sorry, but I really can't get it. All over the web, people from other distros are sharing how they can beat it, but I just can't find a single post from Debian people how they

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-10 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:02:45AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote: > Thanks a lot, that's already good enough for me. Please tell me, ...but please don't tell debian-devel. (MFT set) -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-10 Thread Tong Sun
> . . . If anyone can get VmWare-Workstation 7 installed on > Debian (Testing/Sid), I would very much like to hear your story. > > I installed it last week, v7.1.2. I had no trouble, worked like a > charm. Just invoked the installer. I did invoke it as root. I > really can

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-09 Thread Mark Allums
If anyone can get VmWare-Workstation 7 installed on Debian (Testing/Sid), I would very much like to hear your story. Thanks a lot. I installed it last week, v7.1.2. I had no trouble, worked like a charm. Just invoked the installer. I did invoke it as root. I really can't be

Re: Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-09 Thread Tong Sun
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: >> I'm having difficulties installing Vmware v71 under Debian Testing. >> I always get >> >>  gcc and kernel headers must be installed >> >> while doing "vmware-modconfig --console --install-all"

Installing Vmware v71

2010-10-09 Thread Tong Sun
[4th attempt, trying to play with keywords to circumvent the spam filter] Hi, I'm having difficulties installing Vmware v71 under Debian Testing. I always get  gcc and kernel headers must be installed while doing "vmware-modconfig --console --install-all", even though I got both

Bug#444687: ITP: open-vm-tools -- open source implementation of VMware Tools

2007-09-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: open-vm-tools Version : 2007.09.04-56574 Upstream Author : VMware * URL : http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/ * L

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-08 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:14:45AM +0100, Hans Kratz wrote: > >No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong > > Ah, I see. I will take a look at vmware-package. Do you plan on > supporting VMware Server as well? As it is documented in the package docs,

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-08 Thread Hans Kratz
Hi! No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong Ah, I see. I will take a look at vmware-package. Do you plan on supporting VMware Server as well? -- Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Hans Kratz wrote: > Sure. I wasn't aware of that package. AFAICS that package handles only > the VMware kernel modules right now. No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong description in svn.

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Hans Kratz
Hi! HK> After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for HK> Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It HK> should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is HK> supported, support for x86-64 is on my TODO list. That was supposed t

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 12:27:07 when Hans Kratz did gyre and gimble: HK> After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for HK> Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It HK> should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is HK> supported, suppor

VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Hans Kratz
Hi! After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is supported, support for x86-64 is on my TODO list. Licensing and distribution: The VMware Player EULA does

Bug#394138: ITP: vmware-package -- utility for building Vmware related Debian packages

2006-10-20 Thread Marc Haber
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: vmware-package Version : 0.0 Upstream Author : Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : none yet * License : GPL Programming Lang: shell Description :

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-22 Thread Eric Dorland
* Uwe Hermann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:36:35PM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote: > > Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a > > partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was > &g

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-22 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi, On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:36:35PM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote: > Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a > partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was > not an option when there actually was no alternative to it, so why i

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-18 Thread Bernd Schubert
Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:03:31 +0200, Bernd Schubert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Ubuntu already has vmware kernel module packages > > Yes, but adapting them to Debian seems to be nontrivial. I have not > yet been able to get them build on Debi

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-15 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:03:31 +0200, Bernd Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ubuntu already has vmware kernel module packages Yes, but adapting them to Debian seems to be nontrivial. I have not yet been able to get them build on Debian. Greet

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-15 Thread Bernd Schubert
Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:59 +0100, Peter Collingbourne > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official >>repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create >>a tool that will build

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-14 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:59 +0100, Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official >repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create >a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-ser

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-14 Thread Dave Carrigan
On Sunday 13 August 2006 09:18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > * using snapshots and clones based off them are quite useful > > Lvm snapshots work just fine. You've obviously never run VMware if you think that an LVM snapshot is a replacement for a VMWare snapshot. It lea

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:59:57AM +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I found there were no VMw

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-14 Thread Jon Dowland
At 1155469573 past the epoch, martin f krafft wrote: > Why don't those that want to work with QEMU do that, and > those who want to work with VMware worry about its > packaging? > > I can't believe we're having this discussion anyway. It would make sense for each te

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, [UTF-8] Linas Žvirblis wrote: maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely writeable IMHO. That is being worked on as I type this. OT, but does anybody know whether I can operate on VMs in VMware without this fancy UI? I just want to turn on two VMs

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 13, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you aren't running windows then xen is your free alternative. If > you need windows then you need a recent cpu for xen+windows. I always love when somebody knows what I need... -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital sig

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official >

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1658 +0100]: > There is vim available from Debian repositories as well as emacs. Yes, but emacs will be removed. (this is a reply-to experiment) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. kr

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Sebastian Harl
Hi, > > vmware > > QEMU: I really don't get this (type of) discussion... Some people prefer qemu, some others vmware, still others prefer foo. There is vim available from Debian repositories as well as emacs. You can install KDE as well as Gnome, fvwm, ... why not provid

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create > a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server > and vmware-modules-sou

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Linas Žvirblis
Pierre Habouzit wrote: > maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely > writeable IMHO. That is being worked on as I type this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le dim 13 août 2006 15:24, Adrian von Bidder a écrit : > On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the offic

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Linas Žvirblis
Adrian von Bidder wrote: > vmware QEMU: > * is quite fast Quite fast with the accelerator module. There is also full virtualization mode, that can be used with certain operating systems. > * does suspend/resume quite beautifully It can save memory state and load it later o

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > > Dear all, > > > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1236 +0200]: > I know that QEMU Accelerator is not distributable, but providing a sort > of an installer (or even asking an author for a permission to > distribute) should not be any harder than providing an installer for

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Francesco Pedrini
Alle Sunday 13 August 2006 04:06, Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto: > What you mean is vserver and even more so xen. I hear with the latest > versions you can even run windows in xen. You can do that only if your CPU is enabled with VT/Pacifica virtualization technology. Regards, Francesco --

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Linas Žvirblis
Loïc Minier wrote: > Would be nice if we could go as far as shipping binary packages for > e.g. vmware-player, as Ubuntu does: Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was not an option when

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create > a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server > and vmware-modules-source pa

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.0106 +0100]: > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to > create a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) > vmware

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.0125 +0100]: > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create > > a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmwa

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : >> Dear all, >> >> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official >> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create >&

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-12 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > > Dear all, > > > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propos

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-12 Thread Francesco Pedrini
Alle Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit ha scritto: > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > > Dear all, > > > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-12 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > > Dear all, > > > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propos

Re: VMware packaging

2006-08-12 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit : > Dear all, > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create > a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server >

VMware packaging

2006-08-12 Thread Peter Collingbourne
Dear all, I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server and vmware-modules-source packages based on an installation tarball (a la java-package

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-12 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Jeroen Dekkers | Software always used to be free. That changed, but RMS didn't | change. I don't what software he used to write parts of GNU, but it | could have been free, there was enough free software at time. Oh, and | 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel 2) RMS has never written anything of | it AFA

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-12 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:29:14 +0200: > What is wrong with telling him that the kind of problems he's having > is normal with non-free software and say that there are 2 free > alternatives in Debian which would probably not have those problems? > The problem with those solut

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-12 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200: > * Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]: > > You don't have to tell me how glibc works, I develop it. > Yeah, and Daniel Stone is a Linux kernel developer. > Heheheheh But watch out, Jeroen == Hurd developer.. (Ohyes

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:33:34PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it > > is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to > > reinvent th

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
en RMS used > > > commercial software when the GNU software for it was not yet written. > > > You mean proprietary software. There is no conflict between the GPL > > and commerciality (even if Microsoft is trying to implant another > > opinion in people's mind). And yes

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel > > Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the > '-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-' >

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > That's fine with me. At least I'll have a lot more leisure when using > > an available product instead of re-inventing the wheel. Even RMS used > > commercial software when the GNU software for it was not yet written. > > With you

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
t is trying to implant another > opinion in people's mind). And yes, he did so because this was the > fastest way to achieve the goal of an entirely free operating system. > This goal has by now been achieved. You will not find RMS using vmware > for pure convenience. Okay, right,

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the '-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-' thread to not repeat itself? Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgp1zKoq

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves > > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have > > > som

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
PL > and commerciality (even if Microsoft is trying to implant another > opinion in people's mind). And yes, he did so because this was the > fastest way to achieve the goal of an entirely free operating system. > This goal has by now been achieved. You will not find RMS usin

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
use this was the fastest way to achieve the goal of an entirely free operating system. This goal has by now been achieved. You will not find RMS using vmware for pure convenience. Thanks, Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have > > some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software. > > You r

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > some solutions for it (namely using a good, free MUA). You just let > the person helpless, I try to point him to the fix. However if you try > to help somebody you should not be a debian developers because you > said that non-free software is the problem

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Thom May
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: >> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > Isn't the goal of Debian >> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free >> > software anymore? >> >> No, no, nonono, no, no, no. > > 4. Our Priorities are Our U

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Isn't the goal of Debian > > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free > > software anymore? > > No, no, nonono, no, no, no. 4. Our Priorities are Our Users and F

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-11 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian > > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free > > software anymore? IMHO

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:54:54PM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote: > Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple > of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective). > > 1) free vs. non-free alternatives > > I use VMWare 2.0. If you thin

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
ser was. Non-free is the problem here. The question should actually be posted to a vmware list. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpeBQpfpjWS2.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Emil Pedersen
Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > Od: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Do: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10 > 11:26:22 2002 > Temat: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0 > Data: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200 >

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Sebastian Rittau
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Isn't the goal of Debian > > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free > > software anymore? > > No, no, nonono, no, no, no. Yes, of course. That's one of Debian

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
Od: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Do: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10 11:26:22 2002 Temat: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0 Data: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200 > * Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]: > You don't have to tell me how glibc works, I develop it. Yeah, and Daniel Stone is a Linux kernel developer. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Donald, On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:54:54PM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote: > Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple > of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective). > > 1) free vs. non-free alternatives > > I use VMWare 2.0. If y

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-10 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free > software anymore? IMHO the "we support non-free software" clause was I think this is one of the g

Re: Rant about the flaming here (Was: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0)

2002-04-09 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:42:51PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > I'm getting sick of people who can't read. Let's say the same thing > for the next time. Have you ever considered that maybe the problem is with your communication skills, not with the horde of people who find your messages offensi

Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0

2002-04-09 Thread Donald J Bindner
Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective). 1) free vs. non-free alternatives I use VMWare 2.0. If you think that bochs and Plex86 aren't viable alternatives yet, you can imagine the state of the world (2

Re: Rant about the flaming here (Was: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0)

2002-04-09 Thread Stephen Frost
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > THE PROBLEM HE IS HAVING IS THAT VMWARE DOESN'T PROVIDE A PATCH FOR > THE OLD VERSION HE IS USING. WITH FREE SOFTWARE, HE COULD JUST FIX THE > PROBLEM ITSELF, WITH NON-FREE SOFTWARE THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE. THE CAUSE > OF HIS PRO

  1   2   >