Re: mass bug filing about versioned dependency on the libhdf5-7 virtual package

2012-10-02 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Julien Cristau writes: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 00:28:15 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: >> I tend to think that a re-build (via binNMU or otherwise) will be >> sufficient for most of the packages affected. >> Unless there'll be objections, I'm going to file the respective bug >> repor

Re: mass bug filing about versioned dependency on the libhdf5-7 virtual package

2012-10-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 00:28:15 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > I tend to think that a re-build (via binNMU or otherwise) will > be sufficient for most of the packages affected. > > Unless there'll be objections, I'm going to file the respective > bug reports regarding the v

Re: versioned dependency on the libhdf5-7 virtual package

2012-09-15 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Ivan On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:07:57PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > This issue was already discussed [1], and I've filed the > respective bug report [2] (to which there was no reply so far, > though), but now I see that there's a few more packages in > Wheezy with a dep

Re: versioned dependency on the libhdf5-7 virtual package

2012-09-14 Thread Alastair McKinstry
For libhe5-hdfeos0, i'm working on this. One thing I need to check is HDF5 dependencies. he5-hdfeos0 was built and tested against HDF5 1.8.7. Since then HDF5 has a new version 1.8.8 with some significant changes; a new HDFEOS5 upstream was released to use it (5.1.14). HDF5 1.8.8 is in Debian. I ne

versioned dependency on the libhdf5-7 virtual package

2012-09-13 Thread Ivan Shmakov
This issue was already discussed [1], and I've filed the respective bug report [2] (to which there was no reply so far, though), but now I see that there's a few more packages in Wheezy with a dependency on libhdf5-7. Consider, e. g.: $ bzcat \ < http.debian.