>>>>> Julien Cristau <julien.cris...@logilab.fr> writes: >>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 00:28:15 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> I tend to think that a re-build (via binNMU or otherwise) will be >> sufficient for most of the packages affected. >> Unless there'll be objections, I'm going to file the respective bug >> reports regarding the versioned dependency on libhdf5-7 against the >> following packages. (The affected versions and architectures >> [though only amd64 and i386 were tested] are shown, as well as the >> Depends: list items triggering the check.) > NAK. If a binNMU is all that's needed then please don't file bugs > against the packages. See http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU ACK, thanks for the pointer! The problem is that I'm yet unsure whether a binNMU will be sufficient or not. My analysis is below, and unless there'd be objections, I'd be filing a bug against release.debian.org, with the binNMU entries as follows. nmu libcgns_3.1.3.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' nmu nexus_4.2.1-svn1614-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' nmu r-cran-hdf5_1.6.10-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' nmu tessa_0.3.1-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' nmu udav_0.7.1.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' AIUI, the packages affected are exactly those built against pre-1.8.8-7.1 versions of the Source: hdf5 libraries. That may explain the versioned dependency, and may be a good indication for that a binNMU will be sufficient to get the issue fixed. --cut: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog -- hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them. And don't version the libhdf5-7 symbols file, so the dependency can also be satisfied by the mpi packages' Provides. * Use DEB_HOST_ARCH instead of DEB_BUILD_ARCH in debian/rules. * Don't require root for debian/rules clean. -- Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:25:35 +0000 --cut: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog -- As per http://packages.qa.debian.org/, all the packages I've listed before entered unstable prior to 2012-02-18 (except for Source: tessa, which was uploaded a couple of days after.) http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcgns.html • [2012-01-24] Accepted 3.1.3.4-1 in unstable (low) (Sylvestre Ledru) http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nexus.html • [2011-07-31] Accepted 4.2.1-svn1614-1 in unstable (low) (Tobias Stefan Richter) NB: apparently, nexus was re-built once as 4.2.1-svn1614-1+b1 on 2012-01-26 (before hdf5_1.8.8-7.1, and still bearing a possibly unwarranted versioned dependency on libhdf5-7.) http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/r-cran-hdf5.html • [2012-01-18] Accepted 1.6.10-1 in unstable (low) (Dirk Eddelbuettel) http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tessa.html • [2012-02-20] Accepted 0.3.1-6 in unstable (low) (Josselin Mouette) http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udav.html • [2012-01-25] Accepted 0.7.1.2-3 in unstable (low) (Salvatore Bonaccorso) TIA. -- FSF associate member #7257 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86fw5wp27b....@gray.siamics.net
