Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-21 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 9/21/25 12:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Bas Couwenberg wrote: On 9/20/25 12:18 PM, Yadd wrote: could you try this debian/watch file ? We need a backport of devscripts 2.25.19 first. for trying? you can use the unstable version. Yes, logging into

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-21 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 9/21/25 6:07 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Am 21. September 2025 14:05:16 MESZ schrieb Bas Couwenberg : Yes, logging into a sid chroot on trixie systems is too much effort to quickly test the watch file version. If you want people to use version 5, make it available in trixie via backports

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-21 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
Am 21. September 2025 14:05:16 MESZ schrieb Bas Couwenberg : > >Yes, logging into a sid chroot on trixie systems is too much effort to quickly >test the watch file version. > >If you want people to use version 5, make it available in trixie via backports. > as a regular workflow: sure. however,

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 9/20/25 12:18 PM, Yadd wrote: > > could you try this debian/watch file ? > We need a backport of devscripts 2.25.19 first. for trying? you can use the unstable version. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(de

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-20 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 9/20/25 12:18 PM, Yadd wrote: On 9/20/25 12:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: could you try this debian/watch file ? Version: 5 Template: Github Owner: FrodeSolheim Project: fs-uae We need a backport of devscripts 2.25.19 first. Kind Regards, Bas

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-20 Thread Yadd
On 9/20/25 12:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: (Please CC me when replying as I'm not subscribed to debian-devel) Hi, I'm currently trying to update fs-uae [1] to the latest upstream version which now publishes their releases on Github which means I had to update the debian/watch file. I

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-20 Thread Ahmad Khalifa
On 20/09/2025 11:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: version=4 opts="searchmode=plain,\ filenamemangle=s%v?@ANY_VERSION@%@PACKAGE@-$1.tar.xz%" \ https://api.github.com/repos/FrodeSolheim/fs-uae/releases?per_page=100 \ https://api.github.com/repos/[^/]+/[^/]+/tarball/v?@ANY_VERSION@ This matche

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello Holger, On Sat, 2025-09-20 at 10:53 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 12:39:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > (Please CC me when replying as I'm not subscribed to debian-devel) > > ack. Thanks! > > I followed the guide from the Debian wiki [2] and used t

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-20 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 12:39:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > (Please CC me when replying as I'm not subscribed to debian-devel) ack. > I followed the guide from the Debian wiki [2] and used the following options > and URLs > for debian/watch: there has been quite some developm

uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
(Please CC me when replying as I'm not subscribed to debian-devel) Hi, I'm currently trying to update fs-uae [1] to the latest upstream version which now publishes their releases on Github which means I had to update the debian/watch file. I followed the guide from the Debian wiki [2] and used