Bug#1085180: ITP: mcds -- Mutt CardDav search program

2024-10-15 Thread Andrew Bower
: Mutt CardDav search program mcds is a command line tool primarily used as a search query plugin for mutt to query a CardDav server. This utility would supply Debian with the missing functionality of live contact search for the mutt MUA against CardDav servers such as Nextcloud and ownCloud

Re: dash and mutt

2024-04-19 Thread Leandro Cunha
Hi, Em sex., 19 de abr. de 2024, 04:46, Marco d'Itri escreveu: > On Apr 19, José Luis González González wrote: > > > I even tried to reach dash maintainer privately and he is not even on > > the package's field (queried by dpkg), there's someone who is obviosly > > fake instead: Andrej Shadura

Re: dash and mutt

2024-04-19 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 19, José Luis González González wrote: > I even tried to reach dash maintainer privately and he is not even on > the package's field (queried by dpkg), there's someone who is obviosly > fake instead: Andrej Shadura I have met Andrej a few times and I am quite sure that he is real. Or mayb

dash and mutt

2024-04-19 Thread José Luis González González
Good day, There's an issue with the dash package and maintainer, and mutt as well. I even tried to reach dash maintainer privately and he is not even on the package's field (queried by dpkg), there's someone who is obviosly fake instead: Andrej Shadura The issues with dash so f

Re: mutt removed from testing while the bug was closed (fixed)

2023-10-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-10-26 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2023-10-26 02:03:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: [...] > Hmm... This seems to be due to a bug in the BTS when the bug was > reopened for stable. At > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051563#25 > "Bug reopened Request was from Antonio

Re: mutt removed from testing while the bug was closed (fixed)

2023-10-25 Thread Santiago Vila
El 26/10/23 a las 2:11, Vincent Lefevre escribió: This seems to be due to a bug in the BTS [...] Hello. This is a bug or a feature depending on how you look at it. Reopening a bug is known to clear the version on which it was closed (I think this normally makes sense and the cases where it doe

mutt removed from testing while the bug was closed (fixed)

2023-10-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, I've seen on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mutt that mutt was removed from testing on 2023-10-25, with a link to https://tracker.debian.org/news/1473564/mutt-removed-from-testing/ which says: -- FYI: The status of the

Re: mutt removed from testing while the bug was closed (fixed)

2023-10-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-10-26 02:03:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mutt that mutt was > removed from testing on 2023-10-25, with a link to > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1473564/mutt-removed-from-t

Bug#1009761: ITP: mutt-wizard -- system to automatically configure

2022-04-16 Thread Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com * Package name: mutt-wizard Version : 3.2.1 Upstream Author : Luke Smith * URL : https://github.com/LukeSmithxyz/mutt-wizard

Bug#882300: ITP: neomutt -- A command line mail reader (or MUA). It's a version of Mutt with added features.

2017-11-21 Thread Antonio Radici
mail reader (or MUA). It's a version of Mutt with added features. To give more context, have a look at b/870635; neomutt was packaged as 'mutt' in stretch but the current mutt maintainer has raised issue of the tarball being used: since the codebase of neomutt diverged (initia

Re: [j...@debian.org: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt tarball]

2017-11-19 Thread Antonio Radici
[It turns out that hitting 'g' on mutt replies the original CC, copy paste of my response below.] On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:46:21PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Bcc: Subject: Re: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt > tar

[j...@debian.org: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt tarball]

2017-11-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
[ I screwed up CCing this in the first place ] - Forwarded message from Jonathan Dowland - Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:46:21 + From: Jonathan Dowland To: Antonio Radici Cc: 870...@bugs.debian.org, Kevin McCarthy Subject: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Muri Nicanor
hi On 06/24/2016 05:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05: >>>> I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. >>> I have no idea what you are referring to

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Adam Borowski , 2016-06-24, 17:32: I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse. Send comp

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05: > >>I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. > >I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say > >that I think the name "mut

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05: I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors initials, but… to me it sounds like &

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > His package is in the archive for over two years[3] and > looks like no one felt offended enough to fill a bug before. I only noticed mutt-kz three months ago… And I'd also be fine with a rename to mutt-karel or mut

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Holger, On 24 June 2016 at 06:05, Holger Levsen wrote: > I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say > that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors > initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or pro

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > And I don't think this is a german thing (well…) - the term "KZ" is > known by millions of non german speaking people, cause their loved ones > suffered and died there. s#non german speaking people#non german speaking and german spea

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Victor, On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: > I'm sorry, I didn't know. Thanks. > The name comes from the main author of the project: Karel Zak. [...] > Independently of the badly chosen name, I accepted to deprecate mutt-kz in > favor

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Víctor M . Jáquez L .
On 06/24/16 at 09:05am, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. > > I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say > that I think the name "

mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors initi

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 09:49, Antonio Radici wrote: > Additionally I'm not sure why debian-devel@ was added to this bug. All ITP bugs are CC'd to debian-devel. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Re

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-31 Thread Antonio Radici
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:11:57PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 13:00 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > * Package name: neomutt > > Please don't. We don't need another mutt fork in Debian. > > >

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-31 Thread Wookey
+++ Adam Borowski [2016-05-31 00:00 +0200]: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 08:59:53PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > There will be much users who don't want to use mutt-patched or > > neomutt. The sidebar, notmuch and nntp features for instance aren't > > t

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 08:59:53PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Faidon Liambotis [2016-05-30 20:56 +0300]: > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 06:42:21PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > - The mutt maintainers have been engaging with the neomutt upstream > > already. I

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
e, unfortunately without not much context, as that was a > PM and I wouldn't want to forward without permission. All is said in this thread. Nothing mysterious ;-) > So, first of, a bit of a background for the ITP: > > - The mutt maintainers have been engaging with the neomutt up

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Evgeni Golov [2016-05-30 21:11 +0200]: > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 13:00 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > * Package name: neomutt > > Please don't. We don't need another mutt fork in Debian. Its not a fork. It's just a

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, > > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 13:00 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > * Package name: neomutt Please don't. We don't need another mutt fork in Debian. > > Did you talk to the current mutt maintainers about this? > > > > The changelog

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
; * URL : https://www.neomutt.org/ > > * License : GPL-2 > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : text-based mailreader which gathers all the patches > > against > >Mutt. > >. > >NeoMutt is a sophisticated text-based Mail User Ag

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Víctor M . Jáquez L .
NeoMutt was created when Richard Russon (FlatCap) took all > > > >the old Mutt patches, sorted through them, fixed them up and > > > >documented them. > > > > > > Apart from the standard 'mutt' package, there's at least two > >

Re: Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Alberto Garcia
(I forgot to Cc debian-devel in my previous e-mail) > > >NeoMutt is a sophisticated text-based Mail User Agent > > >supporting MIME, GPG, PGP and threading. > > >. > > >NeoMutt was created when Richard Russon (FlatCap) took all > > >

Bug#825821: ITP: neomutt -- NeoMutt is a place to gather all the patches against Mutt.

2016-05-30 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
gathers all the patches against Mutt. . NeoMutt is a sophisticated text-based Mail User Agent supporting MIME, GPG, PGP and threading. . NeoMutt was created when Richard Russon (FlatCap) took all the old Mutt patches, sorted through them, fixed them up and documented them

Bug#785534: ITP: goobook -- access your Google contacts from command-line or mutt

2015-05-17 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
Google contacts from command-line or mutt goobook can be used to access your Google contacts from the command-line and from MUAs such as Mutt. It can be used from Mutt the same way as abook. I plan to maintain this package myself but I will need a sponsor. signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Am 8.1.2008 schrieb "Javier Fernandez-Sanguino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >I do not suggest you report automatically, as you will not review >false positives. That wasn't my plan; acutally listmasters strongly discourage from doing so. Problem was, that I sorted spam to one directory, and was to lazy

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
> Am 8.1.2008 schrieb "Kumar Appaiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Would be cool, if your script would then automatically detect, if the > mail was received via bts or via a list and bounce it to the correct > report address. I do not suggest you report automatically, as you will not review false positi

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:26:30PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > macro index , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > macro index , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" OK, the second index should be `pager'. And I just tested it on a real spam with report-listspam@, and it works! :-) Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel,

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 12:41:23PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Would be cool, if your script would then automatically detect, if the > mail was received via bts or via a list and bounce it to the correct > report address. Er, that's too cool, but here's a simple one to start. Just add this t

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! Am 8.1.2008 schrieb "Kumar Appaiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [ reporting spam to listmasters and bts admins ] >I think a single keystroke can be scripted for this. I'll try later >tonight, though someone else is welcome to do this ahead of me. :-) Would be cool, if your script would then auto

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > That is incredibly useful, is tehre any similar tool to report spam > delivered through the Debian Mailing Lists? > > Sorry if this has been answered before, I am just starting to keep up > with mail backlog. Well, the steps are simply: 1.

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > In case it's useful to anyone, here's a quick hack I put together for > > easy BTS spam reporting from mutt. > > That is incredibly useful, is tehre any similar tool to repo

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-07 Thread Amaya
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > In case it's useful to anyone, here's a quick hack I put together for > easy BTS spam reporting from mutt. That is incredibly useful, is tehre any similar tool to report spam delivered through the Debian Mailing Lists? Sorry if this has been answered b

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2007-12-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:20:01PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > I use mutt but I don't have the library of scripts that I'm sure many DD's > have to deal with debian-specific stuff, although I'd love one. Would > anyone besides me be interested in pooling mutt scr

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2007-12-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, David Nusinow said: > > I use mutt but I don't have the library of scripts that I'm sure many DD's > have to deal with debian-specific stuff, although I'd love one. Would > anyone besides me be interested in pooling mutt scripts

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2007-12-12 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:44:08PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > In case it's useful to anyone, here's a quick hack I put together for > easy BTS spam reporting from mutt. > > Firstly a keybinding for .muttrc: > > macro index B "unset > wait_key\nbugspam\nse

reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2007-12-11 Thread Hamish Moffatt
In case it's useful to anyone, here's a quick hack I put together for easy BTS spam reporting from mutt. Firstly a keybinding for .muttrc: macro index B "unset wait_key\nbugspam\nset wait_key\n" macro pager B "unset wait_key\nbugspam\nset wait_key\n" Secondly,

Bug#416862: O: mutt-ng

2007-03-30 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Package: mutt-ng Severity: normal I hereby want to orphan mutt-ng as ist isn't maintained upstream anymore [0]. To synchronise the package with mutt and fix the new and upcoming security issues isn't my intetion as I then have to carry over the upstream work. [0] http://mutt-ng.supe

Bug#410657: ITP: mutt-vc-query -- vCard query utility for mutt

2007-02-12 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: mutt-vc-query Version : 002 Upstream Author : Andrew Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://rolo.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Elimar Riesebieter: > Differences between mutt and mutt-ng: You should make clear that this list of features compares the mutt and mutt-ng packages (I hope it does). Debian's mutt package contains some of the mutt-ng patches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 the mental interface of Paul Hampson told: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > > Elimar Riesebieter: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread Adeodato Simó
* David Schmitt [Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:44:31 +0100]: > how many prospective maintainers have already failed to fill out these > fields. #293361 - reportbug: add reminder to fill fields to the ITP template -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Don't ask the barber whe

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread Jesus Climent
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > Same problem here. Reported to Norbert but never got deeper into it. > > Let's try renaming mutt_dotlock to muttng_dotlock ;) > > I did that after your report a while ago, and my last package[0] > includes muttng_dotlock

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Jesus Climent wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it > > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool > > (mbox in /var/mail) is read-only.

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread David Schmitt
On Thursday 24 March 2005 00:09, Petri Latvala wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:35:35PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > Version : x.y.z > > Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://www.example.org/ > > * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X,

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-24 Thread Paul Hampson
mbox in /var/mail) is read-only. (vanilla) Mutt can use it > > fine. > Same problem here. Reported to Norbert but never got deeper into it. Let's try > renaming mutt_dotlock to muttng_dotlock ;) I hard-linked muttng_dotlock to mutt_dotlock but it didn't help. I might futz

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-23 Thread Jesus Climent
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool > (mbox in /var/mail) is read-only. (vanilla) Mutt can use it > fine. Same

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-23 Thread Paul Hampson
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > Elimar Riesebieter: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: mutt-ng > Also note that Norbert Tretkowski has already crea

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-23 Thread Petri Latvala
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:35:35PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Version : x.y.z > Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.example.org/ > * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Didn't feel the need to fill those in? -- Petri Latva

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-23 Thread Per Olofsson
Elimar Riesebieter: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: mutt-ng Also note that Norbert Tretkowski has already created a mutt-ng package, although he doesn't intend to upload it (yet)

Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

2005-03-23 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: mutt-ng Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Descriptio

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-16 Thread Julien Louis
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 01:57:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > If it is of any use, I would like to offer sponsorship for the > package, in the hope to make peace over the issue. The packages is available at http://ptitlouis.sysif.net/debian. For instance msmtp does not provides mail-transp

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-16 Thread Christian Surchi
ked first before writing > back to the list. Thus I hope you accept my apologies. Already accepted. > I would suggest not naming it an "smtp plugin for mutt" though > because it works equally well with every other product that uses > /usr/sbin/sendmail. You are right, but I t

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-14 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:11:07AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 10, 2004: > > >Is there a text describing the contract of packages providing > > mail-transport-agent? > > At least "All MTA packages must come with a newaliases program, even > if it

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-14 Thread Loïc Minier
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 10, 2004: >Is there a text describing the contract of packages providing > mail-transport-agent? At least "All MTA packages must come with a newaliases program, even if it does nothing, but older MTA packages did not do this so programs should no

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:00:35PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Monday 11 October 2004 19:18, Henning Makholm wrote: > > That is up to the system administrator to arrange. If it provides a > > Satifying package's Depends: is in the domain of packaging system handlers. > Ever seen a debian/co

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 11 October 2004 21:30, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Monday 11 October 2004 19:18, Henning Makholm wrote: > > > The definition of mail-transport-agent is that it provides a > > > /usr/sbin/sendmail that local software can use to submit email

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 19:00, George Danchev wrote: Normally I wouldn't mention it but if you're going to pull people up on their grammar please at least get it right. :-) > p.s. s/an MTA/a MTA Nope. An MTA, an SOS, a UPS. It's dependent on vowel /sounds/ rather than vowels. Adam

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Monday 11 October 2004 19:18, Henning Makholm wrote: > > The definition of mail-transport-agent is that it provides a > > /usr/sbin/sendmail that local software can use to submit emails for > > delivery to arbitrary addresses with some reasonable ex

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:00:35PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > MTA is a software talking at least one Mail Transfer Protocol (like SMTP, > UUCP, X.400 ...) My example, delivering mail via 'ssh mailhub /usr/sbin/sendmail', is an example of transporting mail. > These Mail Transfer Agents are re

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 11 October 2004 19:18, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > IMHO a MTA must be capable acts as a client and as a server to transfer > > messages between machines and is responsible for properly routing > > messages to their destination, e.g. RFC 974.

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > IMHO a MTA must be capable acts as a client and as a server to transfer > messages between machines and is responsible for properly routing > messages to their destination, e.g. RFC 974. msmtp does not do all > of these, therefor it is not a MTA, and

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-11 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 10 October 2004 14:58, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote: > > Il sab, 2004-10-09 alle 17:48, martin f krafft ha scritto: > > > > I think it's not a right comparison, nullmail is an MTA. and > > > > AFAIK, msmtp is not an MTA: >

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Julien Louis
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 01:57:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > I would suggest not naming it an "smtp plugin for mutt" though > because it works equally well with every other product that uses > /usr/sbin/sendmail. I agree with the "smtp plugin for mutt" removal,

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm not msmtp fan or user, but I lost two minutes to read the home page > trying to understand the differences. msmtp is simply a way to delivery > mail to a remote smtp server. For example you cannot have it listening > on 25 port, so I cannot see i

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.1601 +0200]: > ssmtp seems to support SSL/TLS connections also. The package depends on > libssl and a quick glance at the source shows that support is there. What ssmtp are you talking about? cirrus:~> dpkg -p ssmtp | grep Depends Depends

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 02:05:06PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.0939 +0200]: > > ssmtp seems to be its competitor, not nullmailer. (ssmtp and msmtp > > appear to provide /usr/bin/sendmail only, while nullmailer appears to > > provide por

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.1442 +0200]: > > and much more ... also has msmtpqueue which is a pair of very simple shell > > scripts that allows you to "queue" mails and send them all at a later time > > (useful for dialup connections: write your mails offline and send the

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:05:45PM +0300, George Danchev said > > oh well, msmtp has TLS and SASL and IPv6, so I guess it is more > > featureful than nullmailer... > > and much more ... also has msmtpqueue which is a pair of very simple shell > scripts that allows you to "queue" mails and send th

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.0939 +0200]: > ssmtp seems to be its competitor, not nullmailer. (ssmtp and msmtp > appear to provide /usr/bin/sendmail only, while nullmailer appears to > provide port 25 only.) > > But otherwise it's a good question.. Yes, which I would

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
? > :o mail currently is a MUA, it will communicate with sendmail, i.e., require a MTA to get its mail off. > > > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary > > > called by mutt. Then msmtp is just like any MTA, but accepts mail on a different binary (t

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread martin f krafft
about msmtp. You all have convinced me that it is in fact not Just Another, but rather a worthy addition to the Debian archive. I am sorry it took me so long, I should have checked first before writing back to the list. Thus I hope you accept my apologies. I would suggest not naming it an "smtp plug

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Loïc Minier
Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 10, 2004: > Deep difference. Our mail-transport-agents are able to behave as daemon, > listening on 25 port. msmtp doesn't, and it's the same for nail. Do you > think that nail could be an MTA? Do you think that any evolution of > mail(1) could be se

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Christian Surchi
MTA, only because is able to "speak" smtp? :o > oh well, msmtp has TLS and SASL and IPv6, so I guess it is more > featureful than nullmailer... They are two different projects with different targets. > > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary > >

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Christian Surchi
Il dom, 2004-10-10 alle 01:32, Henning Makholm ha scritto: > > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary called > > by mutt. > > If it provides /usr/sbin/sendmail, then by definition it is a > mail-transport-agent and should, if packaged, declare itself

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-10 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:04:43PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1616 +0200]: > > msmtp is an SMTP client that can be used as an "SMTP plugin" for Mutt and > > probably other MUAs (mail user agents). > >

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > msmtp is not an MTA: > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary called > by mutt. If it provides /usr/sbin/sendmail, then by definition it is a mail-transport-agent and should, if packaged, declare itself

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread Loïc Minier
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sat, Oct 09, 2004: > you might understand my reaction. Of course! Maybe the OP should have provided a better description, for example with a listing of features, or with reasons why the software distinguish itself from alternatives? But there's no need to

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1907 +0200]: > Well "plugin" may not be the appropriate word to define the msmtp > function in mutt. But is there any *good* reason to make so much > noise for just one word ? No. But if you - are aware of

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread Julien Louis
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:48:55PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary > > called by mutt. > > oh, and calling it a plugin make is sounds so much better. are these > guys marketing specialists or softwar

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread George Danchev
ch more ... also has msmtpqueue which is a pair of very simple shell scripts that allows you to "queue" mails and send them all at a later time (useful for dialup connections: write your mails offline and send them when you are online). > > I think that msmtp simply will take th

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread martin f krafft
what's the difference? oh well, msmtp has TLS and SASL and IPv6, so I guess it is more featureful than nullmailer... > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary > called by mutt. oh, and calling it a plugin make is sounds so much better. are these guys marketing

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread Christian Surchi
Il sab, 2004-10-09 alle 17:04, martin f krafft ha scritto: > also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1616 +0200]: > > msmtp is an SMTP client that can be used as an "SMTP plugin" for Mutt and > > probably other MUAs (mail user agents). > > It

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread Loïc Minier
tp supports SASL, and that is is developed actively. The last release of nullmailer upstream is quite old now, given the path that SMTP is taking right now... If you want to send mail via SMTP with Mutt, you're likely to find yourself typing "smtp client mutt" in google, or &quo

Re: Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1616 +0200]: > msmtp is an SMTP client that can be used as an "SMTP plugin" for Mutt and > probably other MUAs (mail user agents). > It forwards mails to an SMTP server (for example at a free mail provider) > whi

Bug#275685: ITP: msmtp -- smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

2004-10-09 Thread Julien Louis
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: msmtp Version : 1.2.3 Upstream Author : Martin Lambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://msmtp.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt

Re: mutt co-maintainer badly needed

2003-08-04 Thread Jesus Climent
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:37:53AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I need help with: > - classifying and forwarding upstream open bugs > - eventually packaging the mutt CVS tree, as the author has not made any > new snapshots in the last months I could co-maintain mutt if only a

Re: mutt co-maintainer badly needed

2003-08-03 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:37:53AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > - eventually packaging the mutt CVS tree, as the author has not made any > new snapshots in the last months He doesn't seem to be committing much, either. A patch I sent was repeatedly ignored.

mutt co-maintainer badly needed

2003-08-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
I need help with: - classifying and forwarding upstream open bugs - eventually packaging the mutt CVS tree, as the author has not made any new snapshots in the last months -- ciao, | Marco | [1076 ne2PTad64PE/6]

Re: "mutt -y" speed

2002-04-05 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:17:07PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > What do the columns in slabinfo mean? Umm, you can read the meaning in the source. There is an interesting additional profile option where ou can actually see the nuber of use of the slab cache. (turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB or only #define

Re: "mutt -y" speed

2002-04-05 Thread Jaakko Niemi
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I have configured "mutt -y" so it returns a list of a number of > Maildirs, and noticed something strange in performance. ... > I have tried restarting the LDAP server, but this doesn't help. Are you runni

  1   2   3   >