On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:39:32PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:27 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > * Ben Hutchings [100804 04:42]:
> >
> > > > http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php
> > > I think some of these are old vers
Hi Ralf,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.08.2010, 01:50 +0200 schrieb Ralf Treinen:
> http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php
with magic-haskell-doc there has been a mistake during package rename.
I’ve brought up the issue on debian-haskell.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachi
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:46:42PM -0400, Daniel E. Markle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:50:55AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > I started to file bugs against packages that are not installable on any
>
> I am working on xtrkcad (on your list) at Debconf now. It already has a bug
> fil
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:27 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Ben Hutchings [100804 04:42]:
>
> > > http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php
> > I think some of these are old versions of arch:all packages that for
> > some reason have not been
Hi!
* Ben Hutchings [100804 04:42]:
> > http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php
> I think some of these are old versions of arch:all packages that for
> some reason have not been automatically removed. I think you should
> consider only the latest version of
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 01:50 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started to file bugs against packages that are not installable on any
> architecture. There were only a handful of them in testing, but now I am
> turning to unstable and that now more looks like a mass bug filing. So
> I reckoned
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:50:55AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> I started to file bugs against packages that are not installable on any
I am working on xtrkcad (on your list) at Debconf now. It already has a bug
filed for this issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549039
--
Hi,
I started to file bugs against packages that are not installable on any
architecture. There were only a handful of them in testing, but now I am
turning to unstable and that now more looks like a mass bug filing. So
I reckoned I'd better ask here whether that would be OK.
The source is the d
8 matches
Mail list logo