Hi, I started to file bugs against packages that are not installable on any architecture. There were only a handful of them in testing, but now I am turning to unstable and that now more looks like a mass bug filing. So I reckoned I'd better ask here whether that would be OK.
The source is the daily analysis done by edos-debcheck, the results of which is available on edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/. Packages can be temporarily uninstallable in sid and on some architectures for all possible transient reasons, so I think a good start would be packages that (1) do not install on *any* architecture and (2) are not installable for a certain length of time (e.g., 1 month) In that case I would file a bug with severity=grave since the package is not usable for all, or at least a large number of, users. Currently there are 68 packages that satisfy (1), I didn't check for (2) yet: http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php Any opinions? -Ralf -- Ralf Treinen Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100803235055.ga8...@uranium.pps.jussieu.fr
