On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:21:34PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >ifupdown 0.7~alpha5 was uploaded to unstable rather than experimental by
> >mistake. Since version numbers aren't allowed to go backwards, we now
> >have 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15 in unstable, but for the purposes of
>
> Don't we
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:21:34PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Don't we have epochs for this? I know they are annoying and should
> be avoided, but they are still a blessing compared to the current
> confused versioning scheme.
Epochs are for when your entire version numbering scheme permanen
Fabian Greffrath, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 16:21:34 +0200, a écrit :
> >ifupdown 0.7~alpha5 was uploaded to unstable rather than experimental by
> >mistake. Since version numbers aren't allowed to go backwards, we now
> >have 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15 in unstable, but for the purposes of
>
> Don't we hav
ifupdown 0.7~alpha5 was uploaded to unstable rather than experimental by
mistake. Since version numbers aren't allowed to go backwards, we now
have 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15 in unstable, but for the purposes of
Don't we have epochs for this? I know they are annoying and should be
avoided, but th
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Sébastien Riccio wrote:
> I found this "bug" report that is talking exactly about what I'm
> looking for and provides patches
> If i'm right it seems it has been closed and merged in ifupdown-0.7~alpha4.
[...]
> The package version installed on my box is:
>
On 31.08.2011 14:14, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Sébastien Riccio writes:
If i'm right it seems it has been closed and merged in ifupdown-0.7~alpha4.
[...]
The package version installed on my box is:
ifupdown 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15
Notice the +really0.6.15. Try with the ifu
Sébastien Riccio writes:
> If i'm right it seems it has been closed and merged in ifupdown-0.7~alpha4.
[...]
> The package version installed on my box is:
> ifupdown 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15
Notice the +really0.6.15. Try with the ifupdown from experimental, which
IS 0.7~al
Hi,
While "trying" to port the Xen (xapi) network reconfiguration scripts to
debian for the project "Kronos",
I was looking if there was a way to use includes in the
/etc/network/interfaces file, for example
/etc/network/interfaces.d/*
I found this "bug" report that is talking exactly about w
8 matches
Mail list logo