Fabian Greffrath, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 16:21:34 +0200, a écrit : > >ifupdown 0.7~alpha5 was uploaded to unstable rather than experimental by > >mistake. Since version numbers aren't allowed to go backwards, we now > >have 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15 in unstable, but for the purposes of > > Don't we have epochs for this? I know they are annoying and should be > avoided, but they are still a blessing compared to the current confused > versioning scheme.
Epochs are permanent annoying things, while this kind of confusion is only temporary. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110831145153.go3...@type.u-bordeaux.fr
