El 09/07/24 a las 11:45, Simon McVittie escribió:
> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 at 10:57:39 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Agreed: either it's drop-in compatible or we may as well switch the
> > default to NM and/or systemd-networkd.
> >
> > Well, here's a heretical thought: why don't we do th
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:48:06 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>On Jul 11, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
>> On 11.07.24 08:13, Marc Haber wrote:
>> > Therefore, you could change
>> > configuration while the Interfacce was up and then just say "ifdown ;
>> > ifup" and be fine. No network configuration softwa
On Jul 11, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 11.07.24 08:13, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Therefore, you could change
> > configuration while the Interfacce was up and then just say "ifdown ;
> > ifup" and be fine. No network configuration software up to today has
> > THAT feature.
> Shouldn't "systemctl rel
On 11.07.24 08:13, Marc Haber wrote:
Therefore, you could change
configuration while the Interfacce was up and then just say "ifdown ;
ifup" and be fine. No network configuration software up to today has
THAT feature.
Shouldn't "systemctl reload systemd-networkd" do exactly that?
--
-- regards
On 11.07.24 02:18, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 7/10/24 20:03, Michael Biebl wrote:
Since there is a lot of support for this idea, the next logical step as smcv
said, would be to make d-i/netcfg networkd aware. At the beginning, this could
be opt-in (for testing purposes) and we could make it the
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:36:19 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz
wrote:
>yes please, I would love to see Debian switch from ifupdown to
>NM/networkd. ifupdown was the perfect tool for the time it was created
>in, but things have advanced, and imho now is a good time to switch.
I agree. Nothing has yet reached t
On 7/10/24 20:03, Michael Biebl wrote:
Since there is a lot of support for this idea, the next logical step as
smcv said, would be to make d-i/netcfg networkd aware. At the beginning,
this could be opt-in (for testing purposes) and we could make it the
default later on.
Any takers?
If someo
On 7/9/24 12:45, Simon McVittie wrote:
To some extent, we are already there: for new laptop/desktop
installations, NM is already the default (certainly true for GNOME,
and hopefully for most/all of the other tasksel-supported desktops).
Right.
For new server/embedded installations, I think ne
Am 10.07.24 um 18:36 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 11:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 at 10:57:39 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Agreed: either it's drop-in compatible or we may as well switch
the
default to NM and/or systemd-networkd.
Well, here's
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 11:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 at 10:57:39 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Agreed: either it's drop-in compatible or we may as well switch
> > the
> > default to NM and/or systemd-networkd.
> >
> > Well, here's a heretical thought: why don
On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 at 10:57:39 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Agreed: either it's drop-in compatible or we may as well switch the
> default to NM and/or systemd-networkd.
>
> Well, here's a heretical thought: why don't we do that anyway, at least for
> new
> installations?
To some ext
11 matches
Mail list logo
