Re: cracklib-runtime NMU

1999-01-20 Thread James Troup
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote: > > As I mentioned in an earlier posting, there's no reason for this bug > > to be release-critical. > > This is another bug. Not being able to compile a package at all *is* > a release-critical problem and violat

Re: cracklib-runtime NMU

1999-01-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote: > As I mentioned in an earlier posting, there's no reason for this bug > to be release-critical. This is another bug. Not being able to compile a package at all *is* a release-critical problem and violates the GPL. Wichert. -- ===

Re: cracklib-runtime NMU

1999-01-19 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Robert Woodcock wrote: > Just wanted to let you know that tonight I plan to recreate the > cracklib-runtime build scripts (with debhelper) since they seem > to be missing a few things and also patch crack_packer so it produces no > output on a successful run, then repackage th

cracklib-runtime NMU

1999-01-19 Thread Robert Woodcock
Just wanted to let you know that tonight I plan to recreate the cracklib-runtime build scripts (with debhelper) since they seem to be missing a few things and also patch crack_packer so it produces no output on a successful run, then repackage the source so it extracts cleanly with dpkg-source -x.