On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 23:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also It's important that we can tell our users "Debian 4.0, as of
> > 2008-01-31 has flashplugin-nonfree version X.Y, skype version Z.Y"
>
> Some non-free works are distributed via Debian's infr
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also It's important that we can tell our users "Debian 4.0, as of
> 2008-01-31 has flashplugin-nonfree version X.Y, skype version Z.Y"
That will never be true as long as those works are non-free. Debian
has no non-free software (and if it does, that's a
Le 31 janv. 08 à 08:52, Franklin PIAT a écrit :
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:48 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Perhaps a possibility would be to have a sort of "module-assistant"-
like package with a database of third-party, non-free software. This
tool would either install the third-party softwar
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:19:17PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 30/01/2008, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > 7 virtualbox
> > In sid, at least in part IIRC
>
> Called virtualbox-ose, but present indeed and also in testing.
virtualbox-ose is the Open Source Edition. My guess it that quite
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:48 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>
> Perhaps a possibility would be to have a sort of "module-assistant"-
> like package with a database of third-party, non-free software. This
> tool would either install the third-party software on demand (like
> googleearth-package)
Hi
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:17:32 +0100
Sebastian Pipping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > * A mapping to current ITPs might be interesting.
> > (Integration into http://wnpp.debian.net/)
>
> I just added that. Currently about 500 RFPs and ITPs
> show more than 0 install
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
* A mapping to current ITPs might be interesting.
(Integration into http://wnpp.debian.net/)
I just added that. Currently about 500 RFPs and ITPs
show more than 0 installs:
http://wnpp.debian.net/?type%5B%5D=ITP&type%5B%5D=RFP&sort=installs;desc
Sebastian
--
To
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:48:06AM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Perhaps a possibility would be to have a sort of "module-assistant"-
> like package with a database of third-party, non-free software. This
> tool would either install the third-party software on demand (like
> googleearth-pack
On 30/01/2008, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > 7 virtualbox
> In sid, at least in part IIRC
Called virtualbox-ose, but present indeed and also in testing.
> > 28sun-j2sdk1.5
> Wrong Java licence - packaged before Sun went "free": I think only
> Java 7 will be fully free IIRC
FWIW: 2008/01/
Le 29 janv. 08 à 23:57, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
One of the lists from popcon.debian.org I find most interesting, is
the list of popular packages currently missing in Debian,
http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_vote>. I understand it to
list the packages our users would love to find in D
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Sebastian Pipping]
> > * Would non-free be an option to all or some of them?
> > Do we have binary only packages in Debian?
>
> Yes. The issue is more that very few package maintainers in Debian
> want to maintain non-free packages.
And that'
[Sebastian Pipping]
> * Would non-free be an option to all or some of them?
> Do we have binary only packages in Debian?
Yes. The issue is more that very few package maintainers in Debian
want to maintain non-free packages.
> * A mapping to current ITPs might be interesting.
> (Integration
hi,
jftr:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 11:57:25 pm Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 10emerald 2241 1079 820 342 0
i may end up packaging this as part of the desktop-bling subproject in
pkg-xorg.
> 26fusion-icon 849 421 184 244
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:57:25PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> One of the lists from popcon.debian.org I find most interesting, is
> the list of popular packages currently missing in Debian,
> http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_vote>. I understand it to
> list the packages our users wo
"Sebastian Pipping" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Would non-free be an option to all or some of them?
Do we have binary only packages in Debian?
My understanding is that it is possible to have binary-only packages in
non-free,
although I really don't know an
* Would non-free be an option to all or some of them?
Do we have binary only packages in Debian?
* A mapping to current ITPs might be interesting.
(Integration into http://wnpp.debian.net/)
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
One of the lists from popcon.debian.org I find most interesting, is
the list of popular packages currently missing in Debian,
http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_vote>. I understand it to
list the packages our users would love to find in Debian, but which
are currently missing. Some are missing
17 matches
Mail list logo
