Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Sebastian Pipping] > > * Would non-free be an option to all or some of them? > > Do we have binary only packages in Debian? > > Yes. The issue is more that very few package maintainers in Debian > want to maintain non-free packages.
And that's as it should be. Non-free software is a dead end, and few developers want to put in ongoing effort for something that is a dead end. If the software vendor doesn't care to maintain the software in the community of its users, and that community can't care enough to put in the ongoing effort to make and maintain a Debian package, I don't see why one would say it's a bad thing for that software to lack a Debian package. -- \ "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, but | `\ where will we find an open tattoo parlor at this time of | _o__) night?" -- _Pinky and The Brain_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
