On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:23:00PM +0100, NoisyCoil wrote:
> oss4-dev is fine (unless diversions of files in linux-libc-dev are
> forbidden): oss4-dev is correctly diverting the header, as a consequence it
> needs not Break or Conflict with linux-libc-dev.
linux-libc-dev defines the interface the
Hi,
Would Matthias or anyone else active in this discussion be willing to
be the reviewer for
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/478?
It has been pending for almost two weeks with zero reviews. I don't
feel it would be prudent of me to merge it with no additional eyeballs
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:21:10PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> However, I'm reasonably certain that there are other cases where diversions
> are intentional and perfectly valid. Unless 'missing-breaks' learns to
> handle them it will report CI failures for *all* of them, at which point we
> mi
On 06.03.25 23:01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
This doesn't give a huge list of packages using diversions, but very
high profile packages are in there.
Keep in mind that many of those are there to support usrmerge; these
probably should be filtered out.
On the other hand, on my system lots of
* Otto Kekäläinen [250306 19:57]:
> Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
> complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
> don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
> distribution without having proper Breaks/Replaces in the
> `debi
On 06.03.25 19:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:21:10PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
However, I'm reasonably certain that there are other cases where diversions
are intentional and perfectly valid.
Do you have an example?
Does perldoc diverting the stub perldoc so that it
Hi!
> > Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
> > complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
> > don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
> > distribution without having proper Breaks/Replaces in the
> > `debian/control` file. This
On 06.03.25 17:51, Bastian Blank wrote:
Because diverts are kind of sledgehammers. Without coordination they
break stuff.
OK, so in *this* case the diversion is in error (in your opinion anyway;
not having looked at the contents of these headers, I have no opinion here).
However, I'm reason
On 06/03/25 17:09, Bastian Blank wrote:
Open an serious bug report against oss4-dev. No need to wait, it needs
to go.
oss4-dev is fine (unless diversions of files in linux-libc-dev are
forbidden): oss4-dev is correctly diverting the header, as a consequence
it needs not Break or Conflict wit
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 03:52:54PM +0100, NoisyCoil wrote:
> Another instance of diversions not being detected is in linux's pipeline
> [1,2]: linux-libc-dev and oss4-dev both install
> /usr/include/linux/soundcard.h, oss4-dev diverts it, missing-break fails. If
> my understanding is correct, this
On 06/03/25 14:25, Lorenzo wrote:
Hello Otto,
[please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed]
Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
distribution wit
Hello Otto,
[please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed]
> Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
> complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
> don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
> distribution without having proper Breaks/Rep
Thanks for the feedback!
Ideally the script
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/blob/master/images/scripts/check_for_missing_breaks_replaces.py
would live in the devscripts package and be extended to have the
features suggested in this thread. However, even in its current form
it ha
On 26/02/2025 00:10, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 08:14:52 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>> $ check_for_missing_breaks_replaces.py -o
>> ${WORKING_DIR}/missing_breaks.xml --changes-file
>> ${WORKING_DIR}/*.changes
>> [ERROR] Missing Breaks/Replaces found
>> [ERROR] foo conflicts wit
Hi,
can this be fixed to suggest Conflicts instead of Breaks/Replaces if the file
in the other package is still shipped in the current version?
Breaks/Replaces implies that ownership should be transferred from the other
package to this one. This is most often correct, but care needs to be taken
Hi!
On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 08:14:52 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
> complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
> don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
> distribution without having proper B
Hi all package maintainers who use Salsa CI,
Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
distribution without having proper Breaks/Replaces in the
`debia
17 matches
Mail list logo
