On 06.03.25 19:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:21:10PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
However, I'm reasonably certain that there are other cases where diversions
are intentional and perfectly valid.
Do you have an example?

Does perldoc diverting the stub perldoc so that it can install the real one count?

(That's the only one on my desktop that's not glx-diversions or usrmerge.)

I kindof doubt that we'd get a majority to sign off on that.
You don't need to use it, so don't?  All of that is opt-in.
Fair enough.

--
-- regards
--
-- Matthias Urlichs

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to