Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-06-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Thorsten Glaser writes: > Just curious… > > I thought one is supposed to use Multi-Arch now, and that > biarch/triarch can finally go away. > > Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those > packages still built anyway? Can’t they please go away? > > bye, > //mirabilos gcc still,

Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-05-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mark Brown (28/05/2012): > Ask the s390x folks, they asked for them. Though what on earth inspired > them to name the new architecture such that the old architecture name is > a substring of the new name is beyond me... As far as I can tell nobody > is really using the biarch packages on most ar

Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-05-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:14:49PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those > packages still built anyway? Can???t they please go away? The biarch packages really aren't any bother, the issue with s390x has been having to jump through hoops due to th

Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-05-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 05:06:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Of course, all of these packages appear to be specific to amd64, so I don't > know why Mark would be adding new biarch packages for s390. You should > probably ask him. Ask the s390x folks, they asked for them. Though what on ear

Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:14:49PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I thought one is supposed to use Multi-Arch now, and that > biarch/triarch can finally go away. > Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those > packages still built anyway? Can’t they please go away? zlib is rather low

Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-05-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Andrey Rahmatullin (22/05/2012): > > Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those > > packages still built anyway? Can’t they please go away? > What are you talking about? Probably that: http://packages.qa.debian.org/z/zlib.html http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/z/zli

Re: zlib and biarch/triarch

2012-05-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:14:49PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Just curious… > > I thought one is supposed to use Multi-Arch now, and that > biarch/triarch can finally go away. > > Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those > packages still built anyway? Can’t they please go away