On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 05:06:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Of course, all of these packages appear to be specific to amd64, so I don't > know why Mark would be adding new biarch packages for s390. You should > probably ask him.
Ask the s390x folks, they asked for them. Though what on earth inspired them to name the new architecture such that the old architecture name is a substring of the new name is beyond me... As far as I can tell nobody is really using the biarch packages on most architectures, it's a check box feature for the architectures - a couple use them to build some of the bootloaders but not many. Aside from this sillyness with the s390x architecture name they're generally zero effort so it's not a big deal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120528162456.gd27...@sirena.org.uk
