Here's the result of my research:
uscan does support git clone. But it won't ignore the .gitattributes file.
I opened https://bugs.debian.org/947317
I went for an ugly README.source using "git deborig" for now.
Thank you everyone for the help!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
Hello Jean-Michel,
On Thu 12 Dec 2019 at 09:48AM +01, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Upstream of phppgadmin has nice unit tests in its github.com repository, but
> they use a .gitattributes file [1] to strip these tests files from the
> distributed tar files: All the unit tests are missing from th
On 12/12/19 2:48 AM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Upstream of phppgadmin has nice unit tests in its github.com repository, but
> they use a .gitattributes file [1] to strip these tests files from the
> distributed tar files: All the unit tests are missing from the orig.tar.
Have you asked upstr
On 12/12/19 3:48 AM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Hello
>
> Upstream of phppgadmin has nice unit tests in its github.com repository, but
> they use a .gitattributes file [1] to strip these tests files from the
> distributed tar files: All the unit tests are missing from the orig.tar.
>
> I won
Hi Jean-Michel,
On 2019-12-12 10:48, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Ideally, I'd like to generate the orig.tar from a "git clone". But uscan
> don't
> support that.
Do you mean uscan's 'mode=git' does honor .gitattributes? I wasn't aware
of that.
Best,
Andrius
signature.asc
Description: Ope
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 12:07 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > Simply having http://www.foo.com/ihave/files/here/foo-(.*)\.tar\.gz
> > in the debian/watch files downloads an html file.
>
> Something like:
>
> opts=filenamemangle=s/\?format=raw$// \
> http://www.foo.com/ihave/
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 12:07 -0500, Chris wrote:
> Greetings everyone,
>
> I am trying to set my debian/watch correctly. The upstream
> site allows you to download (wget for example) with something like:
>
> wget http://www.foo.com/ihave/files/here/foo.tar.gz
>
> However, the source code behind U
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Sorry, but i thought that uscan was done to scan according to the watch
> file...
>
> Irwin Tillman (upstream coder) sent me this url :
> http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/dhcp_probe-1.2.2a.tar.gz
>
> that is activ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:01:36AM +, Laurent Guignard wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote:
Hi mentors,
I wrote a watch file like this :
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:01:36AM +, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> >> Hi mentors,
> >>
> >> I wrote a watch file like this :
> >>
> >> version=3
> >> opts=filenamemangle=s/dhcp_probe/dhcp-probe/ \
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote:
>> Hi mentors,
>>
>> I wrote a watch file like this :
>>
>> version=3
>> opts=filenamemangle=s/dhcp_probe/dhcp-probe/ \
>> http://www.net.princeton.edu/softw
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 21:53 +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi mentors,
You actually wrote to -devel.
> I wrote a watch file like this :
>
> version=3
> opts=filenamemangle=s/dhcp_probe/dhcp-probe/ \
> http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/d
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I wrote a watch file like this :
>
> version=3
> opts=filenamemangle=s/dhcp_probe/dhcp-probe/ \
> http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/dhcp_probe-(.*).tar.gz
>
> The URL to download the source file i
i want to watch free flim please sen to me
thanhs
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd go with 1.0rel+1.0c. Fix it for real with version 1.1.
Okies, thanks. Actually this was what I first considered, but upon
reading the Policy Manual I saw other options, so I needed to ask. =)
--
ZAK B. ELEP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Regi
[Zak B. Elep]
> In a related problem, I'm packaging the latest version of gtklp at
> 1.0c. My earlier package is 1.0 but using version 1.0rel (I was
> stupid, but I think I should have slapped upstream earlier for using
> a very inadequate versioning scheme).
I'd go with 1.0rel+1.0c. Fix it for
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Slap upstream for having broken and confusing version numbers. Dpkg will
> not understand that, either, as will many users who do not bother to
> read the upstream web pages.
In a related problem, I'm packaging the latest version of gtklp at
1.0c. My
Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recently I've been using umn [1] in my watch files for SourceForge
> packages. It looks like this link is dead now. I find I have to update
> the watch file for all my SourceForge packages every six months or so.
> Finding a new link that works is usuall
> I'll do that (they also used 1.7b which means "second release candidate
> for 1.7), but I probably won't be able to rewrite history and make 1.55
> disappear...
I had this problem before and used the equivalent of 1.70.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks to the thread about watchfiles for sourceforge projects I now
>> have a "working" watch file for jabref which I intend to package.
>> However, they used version numbers t
Niv Altivanik (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does ([0-9].[0-9])([0-9]?) help ?
> i noticed having 2 pairs of () added a . in the Debian version.
Thank you, that does it fine.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks to the thread about watchfiles for sourceforge projects I now
> have a "working" watch file for jabref which I intend to package.
> However, they used version numbers that lacked a dot - 1.55 is meant to
> be in between
does ([0-9].[0-9])([0-9]?) help ?
i noticed having 2 pairs of () added a . in the Debian version.
Regards,
--
Niv Altivanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian::GNU/Linux::Addict, Wannabe Debian Developper,
please test my packages: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian
pgpuQ7Q0xO7NZ.pgp
Description: PGP signat
Thanks, Seo! heanet works for me too.
Cheers,
Shaun
On Apr 4, 2005 9:44 PM, Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I am not subscribed to debian-devel, but I read your message
> from the web archive.
>
> I'm using this:
>
> version=3
> http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pye
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Shaun Jackman wrote:
$ file ../neutrino-0.8.2.tar.gz
../neutrino-0.8.2.tar.gz: HTML document text
$ head -2 ../neutrino-0.8.2.tar.gz
Select a Mirror for File:
/n/ne/neutrino/neutrino-0.8.2.tar.gz
Same for me
$ grep -v "#" debian/watch
version=2
http://prdownloads
Shaun Jackman wrote:
>This doesn't work for me:
>
>$ cat debian/watch
>version=2
>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/n/ne/neutrino/neutrino-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>debian uupdate
>$ uscan
>neutrino: Newer version (0.8.2) available on remote site
> (local version is 0.7.3)
>neutrino: Successfully downloade
On Apr 4, 2005 5:02 PM, Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Example:
>
> http://prdownloads.sf.net/a/al/alsamodular/ams-(.*)\.tar\.bz2
This doesn't work for me:
$ cat debian/watch
version=2
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/n/ne/neutrino/neutrino-(.*)\.tar\.gz
debian uupdate
$ uscan
neu
|--==> Shaun Jackman writes:
SJ> On Apr 4, 2005 11:06 AM, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Use something like
>>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/projectname/somefile-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>>
>>Works for me.
SJ> Doesn't work for me though. Instead of a tarball, I get an HTML file
On Apr 4, 2005 11:06 AM, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use something like
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/projectname/somefile-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>
> Works for me.
Doesn't work for me though. Instead of a tarball, I get an HTML file
that starts with...
Select a Mirror for File: /libnj
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:21:41AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Recently I've been using umn [1] in my watch files for SourceForge
> packages. It looks like this link is dead now. I find I have to update
> the watch file for all my SourceForge packages every six months or so.
> Finding a new link
Bill Mitchell writes:
>
> > > What's a wibble?
> >
> > Never seen blackadder? :)
>
> I saw parts of a couple of episodes. The only thing I recall about it
> is "Is he really crazy or has he just put underpants on his head and
> stuck soda straws up his nose?". Never got into it. Most British
> > What's a wibble?
>
> Never seen blackadder? :)
I saw parts of a couple of episodes. The only thing I recall about it
is "Is he really crazy or has he just put underpants on his head and
stuck soda straws up his nose?". Never got into it. Most British
humor goes right past me (Except Monty
Bill Mitchell writes:
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, regarding package diffs:
> > Wibble.
>
> What's a wibble?
Never seen blackadder? :)
Andrew
--
Dehydration - 34%, Recollection of previous evening - 2%, embarrassment
factor - 91%. Advise repair schedule:- off line for 36 hours, re-
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, regarding package diffs:
> Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: watch-1.0-2"):
> > Gunzip will choke on a zero-length compressed file, so I've been
> > gzipping a file which contains a single newline to provide a .diff.gz
> &g
Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: watch-1.0-2"):
> Gunzip will choke on a zero-length compressed file, so I've been
> gzipping a file which contains a single newline to provide a .diff.gz
> file in this situation (legally gzipped, and legally empty of diffs).
Wibble.
> Could
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 18:10:22 -0600
From: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: The watch package doesn't include a context diff. (I've deleted the
: announcement, so I don't know who, offhand, is the maintainer.) Why?
Because it's orig
On Sat, 21 Oct 1995, Ian Murdock wrote:
> [...] the only packages that
> don't need a context diff are packages written specifically by the
> Project for inclusion in the distribution, like dpkg.)
I've been taking the requirement for .diff.gz files in package
uploads as an absolute requirement.
37 matches
Mail list logo
