Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> Hi, >> >> thanks to the thread about watchfiles for sourceforge projects I now >> have a "working" watch file for jabref which I intend to package. >> However, they used version numbers that lacked a dot - 1.55 is meant to >> be in between 1.5 and 1.6, but now of course it is regarded as newer >> than current 1.7. Is there any way to teach uscan about this? > > Slap upstream for having broken and confusing version numbers. Dpkg will > not understand that, either, as will many users who do not bother to > read the upstream web pages.
I'll do that (they also used 1.7b which means "second release candidate for 1.7), but I probably won't be able to rewrite history and make 1.55 disappear... Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
