Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-28 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-28 16:31]: > No. In fact, I just found out slgdbm 1.6 does not compile with slang 1. > I'll probably fix it in 1.7, but let me know if you need > slang1-compatibility. My guess is that we do not need SLang1 compatibility. But who knows? -- Rafael

Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-28 Thread Paul Boekholt
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:13:08 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Well, it is possible to compile the gdbm module with slang 1 - of > > course you'd have to edit the Makefile to install in v1/modules. > The question is: can a module compiled with SLang2 be loaded by Slang1 ? In

Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-28 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-28 14:38]: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:03:21 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > I would keep the first version really short. The only two things that > > are important for now is the package naming, the installation directory > > f

Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-28 Thread Paul Boekholt
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:03:21 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > * Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 21:16]: > > My preference is for slang-foo, as it is more visible that it is > > a slang-related, rather than a generic DSO; slang-gdbm is more > > interesting

Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 21:16]: > My preference is for slang-foo, as it is more visible that it is > a slang-related, rather than a generic DSO; slang-gdbm is more > interesting to a slang developer than to a gdbm one, and this shows that. Thanks for the advice. I w

Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-27 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: [Moving this discussion to debian-devel. The context is the recent upload of the slgdbm package, which is the fisrt package in Debian to provide an SLang2 module. Please, keep Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 08:19]: On 26.09.0

Re: slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW

2005-09-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
[Moving this discussion to debian-devel. The context is the recent upload of the slgdbm package, which is the fisrt package in Debian to provide an SLang2 module. Please, keep Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 08:19]: > On 26.09.05, Paul Boekholt wrote: > > >