[Moving this discussion to debian-devel. The context is the recent upload of the slgdbm package, which is the fisrt package in Debian to provide an SLang2 module. Please, keep Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 08:19]: > On 26.09.05, Paul Boekholt wrote: > > > I should have brought this up sooner, but isn't slfoo too shortish > > for a debian package name? The perl policy says: > ... > > naming convention for module Foo::Bar is libfoo-bar-perl. > > > > The Python naming scheme seems to be python-foo. > > I vote vor slang-foo. (Not only because I like python more than perl, but > because this way slang modules will appear close to slang in an alphabetical > listing (e.g. in aptitude or `ls /usr/share/doc/`). There is no policy in Debian regarding packages which provide SLang2 modules. Maybe we should write a draft and put it in one of the slang2 packages? Alastair, what do you think? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
