Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Jonas, On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Jonas Meurer wrote: > at least for zope2.1[01]-sandbox, i don't know how to fix that issue. > invoking the initscript at postinst/prerm of the -sandbox packages will > cause _all_ zope instances on the system to be restarted, and that isn't > an option at a

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 06/08/2009 Holger Levsen wrote: > > And for the sake of archiving for one, and for the sake > > of people not always online, could you please attach a package list / > > dd-list next time? > > Will try to remember... > > The three packages of this are zope2.10-sandbox, zope2.10-sandbox and

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too > > frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my > > laziness, would you consider doing continuous (or regular) runs of > > piuparts on the whole

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Roland Mas
Holger Levsen, 2009-08-06 14:44:53 +0200 : > Hi Roland, > > On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Roland Mas wrote: >> Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too >> frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my >> laziness, would you consider doing continuous (o

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Holger Levsen wrote: > http://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ > I'm subscribed to > that page and would like to collect questions and answers there, instead of > repeating myself endlessly ;-) That might leave a wrong impression, so let me add: Thanks for asking

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Roland, On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Roland Mas wrote: > Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too > frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my > laziness, would you consider doing continuous (or regular) runs of > piuparts on the whole archive,

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Roland Mas
Holger Levsen, 2009-08-06 11:27:34 +0200 : > Hi, > > as announced at DebConf9 I'll now (slowly) start threads about > different bug categories detected by piuparts, with the aim to agree > on mass filing bugs with the correct severity. Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been to

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi KiBi, On Donnerstag, 6. August 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Holger Levsen (06/08/2009): > > http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html and > > http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html lists > > those packages. > Identical URLs? Gah. Forgot to s/sq

Re: piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

2009-08-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Holger. Holger Levsen (06/08/2009): > http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html and > http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze/processes_running_error.html lists > those packages. Identical URLs? And for the sake of archiving for one, and for the sake of people not always on