On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Thank you for this effort. I must admit piuparts has been too > > frightening for me to try, so far. So, in order to comfort me in my > > laziness, would you consider doing continuous (or regular) runs of > > piuparts on the whole archive, and sending the results to the PTS > These results are already integrated in the PTS, see for example > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lpr.html - piuparts links are only shown in > the PTS if there are problems.
To be clear: the results are already integrated with the PTS in the sense that a "problem" would be reported for non-piuparts-clean packages (and a corresponding link on the right would be added in case of piuparts issues). A pending news item targeted at d-d-a about that is currently waiting in Misc Developer News [1]. However, the mail notification of piuparts error is _not_ integrated with the PTS. To that end I would prefer not having a new keyword, the default one seems reasonable to me, as it is opt-in anyhow and the frequency is (I guess) rather low. Cheers. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature