Re: mass-filing bug reports to use dh-autoreconf during the build

2014-01-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 16.01.2014 18:25, schrieb Matthias Klose: > Last year, I started to file bug reports for the arm64 port, which required > new > versions of the config.sub and config.guess scripts. All of these can be > fixed > by using the autotools-dev package for the update. Now, another port requires > n

Re: mass-filing bug reports to use dh-autoreconf during the build

2014-01-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 20.01.2014 14:09, schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov: > On 16 January 2014 17:25, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Last year, I started to file bug reports for the arm64 port, which required >> new >> versions of the config.sub and config.guess scripts. All of these can be >> fixed >> by using the autotool

Re: mass-filing bug reports to use dh-autoreconf during the build

2014-01-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 16 January 2014 17:25, Matthias Klose wrote: > Last year, I started to file bug reports for the arm64 port, which required > new > versions of the config.sub and config.guess scripts. All of these can be > fixed > by using the autotools-dev package for the update. Now, another port requires

Re: mass-filing bug reports to use dh-autoreconf during the build

2014-01-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 16.01.2014 20:49, schrieb Eric Dorland: > I've already seen several bugs filed against my packages that look like > this filed by Logan Rosen. Have these already been filed? I didn't check which packages you do maintain. Yes, I think he did already file such bug reports. These should be usert

Re: mass-filing bug reports to use dh-autoreconf during the build

2014-01-16 Thread Eric Dorland
* Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote: > Last year, I started to file bug reports for the arm64 port, which required > new > versions of the config.sub and config.guess scripts. All of these can be > fixed > by using the autotools-dev package for the update. Now, another port requires > not