Am 16.01.2014 18:25, schrieb Matthias Klose: > Last year, I started to file bug reports for the arm64 port, which required > new > versions of the config.sub and config.guess scripts. All of these can be > fixed > by using the autotools-dev package for the update. Now, another port requires > not just updates to the config.* scripts, but an update to libtool.m4 and > then > regenerating the configure file (see #726404). I would like to file bug > reports > for these and user-tag them, proposing as user / usertags > > User: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Usertags: autoreconf > > For packages using recent versions of autoconf and automake, the patches are > simple, calling dh_autoreconf in the rules file and adding a b-d on > dh-autoreconf. Packages using older autotools versions may need setting of > environment vars to call the appropriate old autotools scripts. Other > packages > need additional b-d's to pick up .m4 files for the regeneration of the > configure > scripts. There may be small number of packages where the files needed to > regenerate the configure scripts are not in the archive (gutenprint might be > such an example) > > I expect that some hundred bug reports would be filed for this.
I did update https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS with these instructions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52de4284.8050...@debian.org
