Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 13481 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote: > Thank you Lucas for your efforts, but I think that the best would have > been to ignore the complaints that led you to change the delegation. Its still done after getting input from the secretary ruling that it must be different than what was there. An

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-08 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > >> - The complainers are not doing the Policy work, > > > > WT.. Seriously, how is this relevant here? The new delegation poaches > > on terrain pre

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> - The complainers are not doing the Policy work, > > WT.. Seriously, how is this relevant here? The new delegation poaches > on terrain previously delegated to other teams, and you do them awa

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-08 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Charles Plessy wrote: > - The complainers are not doing the Policy work, WT.. Seriously, how is this relevant here? The new delegation poaches on terrain previously delegated to other teams, and you do them away as irrelevant complainers? -- |

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/02/14 at 16:27 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >Regarding sections (admin, text, python, etc.), they delegate > >the decisions on maintaining the list of sections, and their > >respective contents, to the archive maintainers (see Policy, 2.4). > > So a delegate delegates again, right. > Ok, ba

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > Additionally, that text was sent for review to 8 people: > - Ian, as the one who raised the concerns about the previous version > - the Debian project secretary and his assistant > - the policy editors delegates > - Zack, as th

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Am 07.02.2014 13:58, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: >The Debian Policy team defines Debian's technical framework, >including the structure and contents of the Debian archive So, the FTPTeam just got that ripped out of their gut. Which means we can stop doing NEW and in a slightly more extreme interpret

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/02/14 at 12:35 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Am 07.02.2014 11:24, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > >The Debian Policy team defines Debian's technical framework, > >including > >the structure and contents of the Debian archive > > So, the FTPTeam just got that ripped out of their gut. > Which means

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 07/02/14 at 12:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 02/07/2014 11:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The Debian Policy team defines Debian's technical framework, including > > the structure and contents of the Debian archive, design issues of the > > operating system, as well as technical requ

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-07 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, On 02/07/2014 11:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The Debian Policy team defines Debian's technical framework, including > the structure and contents of the Debian archive, design issues of the > operating system, as well as technical requirements that all packages > must satisfy. > > The Debian P

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

2014-02-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Am 07.02.2014 11:24, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: The Debian Policy team defines Debian's technical framework, including the structure and contents of the Debian archive So, the FTPTeam just got that ripped out of their gut. Which means we can stop doing NEW and in a slightly more extreme interp