On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > >> - The complainers are not doing the Policy work, > > > > WT.. Seriously, how is this relevant here? The new delegation poaches > > on terrain previously delegated to other teams, and you do them away as > > irrelevant complainers? > > I think Charles was referring to the people who caused a change in the > delegation text as complainers, not the people who are complaining > about the change in the delegation text? At least that was how I > interpreted "the complaints that led you to change the delegation".
Thanks for clarifying, to you and to Charles who did so off-list. I didn't follow the discussion that led to that change in detail, but my impression was that there were legitimate constitutional concerns that then led to an update. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140208102757.ga25...@anguilla.noreply.org