On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Paul Wise wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> >>  - The complainers are not doing the Policy work,
> >
> > WT.. Seriously, how is this relevant here?  The new delegation poaches
> > on terrain previously delegated to other teams, and you do them away as
> > irrelevant complainers?
> 
> I think Charles was referring to the people who caused a change in the
> delegation text as complainers, not the people who are complaining
> about the change in the delegation text? At least that was how I
> interpreted "the complaints that led you to change the delegation".

Thanks for clarifying, to you and to Charles who did so off-list.

I didn't follow the discussion that led to that change in detail, but
my impression was that there were legitimate constitutional concerns
that then led to an update.

-- 
                           |  .''`.       ** Debian **
      Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                           |   `-    http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140208102757.ga25...@anguilla.noreply.org

Reply via email to