Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the interests of transparancy, openness, keeping people from
> emailing debian-devel instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] why not make the
> published contact address for ftpmaster be a publically viewable
> archive? It doesn't have to be a list that everyon
On 2006-03-13, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nobody mailed ftpmaster@ about the size of the NEW queue. -devel isn't
> a contact address for ftp-master, at least speaking for myself,
> mailinglists have a much lower priority than things like ftpmaster mail,
> and when backlogg
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> > Is there a reason why the question should be made in private?
>>
>> It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the question should be made in private?
>
> It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists, and
> *not* to [EMAIL PROTE
4 matches
Mail list logo
