Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 11:43:40PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude > > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. > > While I tend to agree, this has the unfortunate side-effect of removing > any form of support

Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread Matthew Garrett
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andi writes: >> "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of >> the SC. > > The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. While I tend to agree, th

Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: >> * Bruce Perens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041212 17:50]: >> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > >> > >Imagine a source where all variables are named v and all >> > >functions f. Is that still fr

Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Bruce Perens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041212 17:50]: > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > >Imagine a source where all variables are named v and all > > >functions f. Is that still free? Where do we draw the line? > > >When does sour

Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041212 19:35]: > Andi writes: > > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of > > the SC. > The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. I didn't argue

Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread John Hasler
Andi writes: > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of > the SC. The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. -- John Hasler

Re: Obfuscated source

2004-12-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bruce Perens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041212 17:50]: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > >Imagine a source where all variables are named v and all > >functions f. Is that still free? Where do we draw the line? > >When does source stop to be bad style and start to become obfuscated > >and unacceptable