John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andi writes: >> "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of >> the SC. > > The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG.
While I tend to agree, this has the unfortunate side-effect of removing any form of support for Nvidia graphics cards. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
