W. Borgert wrote:
Shouldn't it be XHTML nowadays?
http://annevankesteren.nl/2004/08/xhtml
XHTML sent as text/html is parsed as HTML by IE and Mozilla. XHTML sent
as application/xhmtl+xml (the recommended way) is *not* recognized by IE
(MIME type isn't recognized and IE asks for downloading
On Friday 12 August 2005 04:26 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I just saw that the bugs viewed via the BTS webpage look much nicer.
> The cleaning up of the headers from the email messages was a
> particularly nice touch.
>
> However, I am wondering if it is a bug that the pages are not even valid
On Saturday 13 August 2005 11:55 am, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.13.1537
+0200]:
> > >>> HTML 4.01. Is this a bug? Should I file a bug agains the b.d.o
> > >>> psuedo
> > >>
> > >> Shouldn't it be XHTML nowadays?
> > >
> > > I personally would li
also sprach Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.13.1537 +0200]:
> >>> HTML 4.01. Is this a bug? Should I file a bug agains the b.d.o psuedo
> >> Shouldn't it be XHTML nowadays?
>
> > I personally would like to see them XHTML1.0 at least. [...]
>
> That or HTML 4.01; there's no real differe
I demand that Jon Dowland may or may not have written...
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:26:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>> However, I am wondering if it is a bug that the pages are not even valid
>>> HTML 4.01. Is this a bug?
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:26:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > However, I am wondering if it is a bug that the pages are not even valid
> > HTML 4.01. Is this a bug? Should I file a bug agains the b.d.o psuedo
>
> Shouldn't i
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:26:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> However, I am wondering if it is a bug that the pages are not even valid
> HTML 4.01. Is this a bug? Should I file a bug agains the b.d.o psuedo
Shouldn't it be XHTML nowadays?
Cheers,
--
W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http
7 matches
Mail list logo