On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +0000, W. Borgert wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:26:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > However, I am wondering if it is a bug that the pages are not even valid > > HTML 4.01. Is this a bug? Should I file a bug agains the b.d.o psuedo > > Shouldn't it be XHTML nowadays?
I personally would like to see them XHTML1.0 at least. I think Erinn's CSS is a good start and hopefully the tip of the iceberg :) I had thought about working on the BTS, but the prospect of setting up a local one, with fake bugs or whatever was quite daunting. Of course that isn't necessary for some of the improvements that could be made. -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ FD35 0B0A C6DD 5D91 DB7A 83D1 168B 4E71 7032 F238 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
