On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 08:20:11PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > If you are talking about a separate repository to the existing
> > repository, that sounds like a Debian derivative. Personally I would
> > encourage people to contribute to Debian rather than starting new
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 20:20:11 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>No, I ain't talking about derivatives of Debian. I talking about a
>mirror by itself, like all the other one around (ftp.xx.debian.org).
What advantage would the world have with just another mirror? Is it in
a unique plac
Hi,
> If you are talking about a separate repository to the existing
> repository, that sounds like a Debian derivative. Personally I would
> encourage people to contribute to Debian rather than starting new
> derivatives, except for experiments that will be re-integrated into
> Debian.
>
> https
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:51 PM Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> I'd like to setup a Debian repository for the community
If you are talking about a Debian mirror, there are some resources here:
https://www.debian.org/mirror/
If you are talking about a separate repository to the existin
Hi !
On 2021-05-17 11:17 p.m., Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:09 PM Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>> Maybe this is not the good mailing list, if so, please let me know which
>> one to go to.
>> I am making a copy of the Debian repository.
>> In the past I us
Yasuhiro Araki dijo [Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:53:21AM +0900]:
> Example of configuration lines are followings for unam.mx.
>
> $addr_db = {
> "133.248.0.0/16" => { # => Request from 133.248.0.0/16
>#For example, DNS client's IP is
>
Florian Weimer:
* ARAKI Yasuhiro:
Do you like cdn.debian.net's idea and implementation?
Sorry if I sound like a broken record. What kind of software do you
use?
Is this just DNS-Balance plus a handful of scripts?
Patially right.
cdn.d.n is consisted by
-(modifiled) DNS-balance to return DN
* ARAKI Yasuhiro:
> Do you like cdn.debian.net's idea and implementation?
Sorry if I sound like a broken record. What kind of software do you
use?
Is this just DNS-Balance plus a handful of scripts?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
On 2/17/08, Leo costela Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This CDN checks your hosts DNS query to retrive your national location.
> - If your located country has Debian Mirror, return this mirror site IP
address.
> - If your located continent has Debian Mirror, return this mirror site I
Hi,
On 2/19/08, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, thanks for implementing a great idea :) This might be specially
> useful for laptop users who often connect from different countries :)
> The implementation also gives me some strange results: From my
> workstation, in the 132.248. cl
ARAKI Yasuhiro dijo [Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 07:53:06PM +0900]:
> Hi all,
> I am a member of debian mirror administration team in Japan.
>
> I announce I start cdn.debian.net.
>
> At 2008-Feb-05, we had started "cdn.debian.org" on global Debian Mirrors.
>
> This CDN checks your hosts DNS query to
On Feb 18, 2008 8:49 AM, Yasuhiro Araki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because cdn.d.n uses DNS query only. Then cdn.d.n can not detect architecture.
> If possible, we can make CDN for each architecture (cf. cdn-i386.d.n).
Already solved, see:
-geomirror.debian.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
On 2/18/08, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> > [No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't
> > know about their subscription status.]
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> > > I ann
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> And it looks to me like the mirror should also be available via
> "/debian".
Oh-oh... I hadn't thought about this problem too.
Well, I guess it's something that could be asked of the local
mirror-admin. If they want their mirror to be a part of the automatic
rotation they cou
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> > - If your located continent has Debian Mirror, return this mirror
> > site IP address.
>
> I don't think this is a good logic for many situations.
> For instance: Brazil is in South America, but it doesn't have good links
>
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:35:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> [No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't
> know about their subscription status.]
>
> Hi
>
> ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> > I announce I start cdn.debian.net.
>
> You could have announced work on th
[No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Keeping the other CCs since I don't
know about their subscription status.]
Hi
ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> I announce I start cdn.debian.net.
You could have announced work on this before, we could have joined
forces! :-)
But I wonder, how do you guys deal with pa
Hi Vincent,
Thank you for your testing.
Do you like cdn.debian.net's idea and implementation?
I would like you to notice your impression for cdn.debian.net to me!
If possible, I hope you to update EU/Fr mirror list for cdn.debian.net
in near future. (please see last part of this mail..)
At Sun,
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du dimanche 17 février 2008, vers
13:46, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> 61.115.118.67 is hanzubin.st.wakwak.ne.jp. I think the whole lists
> you show there are Japanese servers. ftp.de.debian.org is 141.76.2.4
> which is the one I get while being
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du dimanche 17 février 2008, vers
13:58, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> 61.115.118.67 is ftp.de.debian.org. I am located in France with an
>> IP address of one of the largest ISP here. This ISP is hosting an
>> official Debian mirror.
> 6
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 13:08 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> 61.115.118.67 is ftp.de.debian.org. I am located in France with an
> IP
> address of one of the largest ISP here. This ISP is hosting an
> official
> Debian mirror.
61.115.118.67 is assigned to ASNIC, so there is no possible way i
Dne Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:46:47 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:08:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >
> > I just try with host:
> > cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net.
> > deb.cdn.araki.net has address 61.115.118.67
> > deb.cdn.araki.ne
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:08:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> I just try with host:
> cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net.
> deb.cdn.araki.net has address 61.115.118.67
> deb.cdn.araki.net has address 133.5.166.3
> deb.cdn.araki.net has address 133.5.166.3
> deb.cdn.araki.net ha
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 17 février 2008, vers
11:53, ARAKI Yasuhiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Technology and Codes:
> At first, CDN find requester IP's location by Max-mind DB.
> Max-mind DB is same DB file for geoip-bin.deb package.
> At 2nd, CDN checks nati
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A few more examples below. I think lzma isn't the right thing for the
archive. p7zip seems much faster, needs a lot less ram and compression
is similar.
> ..
>>> Should you be using the "-9" o
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> A few more examples below. I think lzma isn't the right thing for the
>>> archive. p7zip seems much faster, needs a lot less ram and compression
>>> is similar.
..
>> Should you be using the "-9" option? The lzma help output says this:
>>
>> -
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A few more examples below. I think lzma isn't the right thing for the
>> archive. p7zip seems much faster, needs a lot less ram and compression
>> is similar.
> ...
>> Lzma: 34306752 Bytes
>> Compressing
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A few more examples below. I think lzma isn't the right thing for the
> archive. p7zip seems much faster, needs a lot less ram and compression
> is similar.
...
> Lzma: 34306752 Bytes
> Compressing : 19410 mrvn 0 376m 370m R 97.2 36.9 1:5
A few more examples below. I think lzma isn't the right thing for the
archive. p7zip seems much faster, needs a lot less ram and compression
is similar.
I didn't measure compression times as I find them somewhat
irelevant. A deb is compressed once but downloaded and decompressed a
million times.
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> For the KDE flavour, this takes less than two minutes for downloading
> the packages, but about 5 minutes for unpacking them.
Measured how? Much of the work that dpkg is doing when it prints
"Unpacking replacement foo ..." is not uncompressing.
--
see shy jo
signature.a
[ debian spamfilters do hate me, resend with different address. ]
Russell Coker wrote:
> Last time I checked the gzip source had no assembler optimisation for systems
> other than i386. So if your 3.2GHz machine (which obviously would be a P4 at
> least not an i386) is running the AMD64 instruc
Russell Coker wrote:
> Last time I checked the gzip source had no assembler optimisation for systems
> other than i386. So if your 3.2GHz machine (which obviously would be a P4 at
> least not an i386) is running the AMD64 instruction set then you could
> probably improve performance by running
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 19 January 2007 02:19, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For the KDE flavour, this takes less than two minutes for downloading
>> the packages, but about 5 minutes for unpacking them. This is done on a
>> reasonable fast i386 machine
On Friday 19 January 2007 02:19, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the KDE flavour, this takes less than two minutes for downloading
> the packages, but about 5 minutes for unpacking them. This is done on a
> reasonable fast i386 machine (3.2ghz, 1gb ram, two 250gb barracudas in
> rai
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I'm not sure if the smaller size that LZMA allows is worth it if it then
> takes a lot longer to unpack files
Unfortunately, that is already the case today. I have a local mirror via
gigabit as I build multiple livecd images on a daily basis.
For the KDE flavour, this take
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:25:38AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I'm not sure if the smaller size that LZMA allows is worth it if
> > > it then takes a lot longer to unpack files, or if it becomes
> > > impossible to do so due to memory requirements.
> >
> > I don't know on memory re
Hi,
> > I'm not sure if the smaller size that LZMA allows is worth it if it then
> > takes a lot longer to unpack files, or if it becomes impossible to do so
> > due to memory requirements.
>
> i don't know on memory requirements. but i didn't notice any speed drawbacks
> for my personal use.
L
> Does LZMA have any drawbacks? According to Wikipedia[1,2] indicates that
> it is slower than gzip, at perhaps around half the speed, but that it
> may require a lot of memory to compress, but reasonably little to
> decompress.
According to my check last year and a few weeks or months:
http://www
On ma, 2007-01-15 at 14:31 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:39:18PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Does LZMA have any drawbacks?
>
> It is far less deployed as bzip2, so manually unpacking .deb packages on
> some random GNU/Linux or Unix rescue system is more likely to f
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:39:18PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Does LZMA have any drawbacks?
It is far less deployed as bzip2, so manually unpacking .deb packages on
some random GNU/Linux or Unix rescue system is more likely to fail.
Bzip2 is pretty ubiquitous these days, so comparing lzma num
On ma, 2007-01-15 at 09:34 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> Since the day that dpkg officially supports lzma compressed packages, Gürkan
> runs
> a mirror of binary packages (i386, sid, main) which can be used easily. The
> general save of downloading is about 30 %. The scripts how it is done and
> t
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin!
>
>> Afaik it is as simple as: The Filename entries are relative to the URL
>> you would put into the sources.list, as in:
>>
>> deb url path/
>> deb url dist +
>
> I see. But how does the mirror script know how the particular Packages
> file
Hi Goswin!
> Afaik it is as simple as: The Filename entries are relative to the URL
> you would put into the sources.list, as in:
>
> deb url path/
> deb url dist +
I see. But how does the mirror script know how the particular Packages
files are referenced from a (most probably remote) sources.l
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>> > I changed my script to check whether the "Filename:" field is with a
>> > './' in front or not. Works for now. Probably another tweaking will be
>> > necessary in the future, but currently it is ok.
>>
>> The ./ is a sideeffect of dpkg-scanpa
Hi!
> > I changed my script to check whether the "Filename:" field is with a
> > './' in front or not. Works for now. Probably another tweaking will be
> > necessary in the future, but currently it is ok.
>
> The ./ is a sideeffect of dpkg-scanpackages. You should not rely on
> that but just reim
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>> There are only 2 cases:
>>
>> Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
>>
>> You could have a Packages file with
>> 'dists///binary-/' that is used as if it hadn't
>> but that is rather unlikely.
>>
>> A good indication you are using a
Hi!
> There are only 2 cases:
>
> Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
>
> You could have a Packages file with
> 'dists///binary-/' that is used as if it hadn't
> but that is rather unlikely.
>
> A good indication you are using a Packages file wrong is also if all
> the packages it re
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:54:27PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
>> Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
>> supposed to be?
>
> No
There are only 2 cases:
Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
You could
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:54:27PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
> supposed to be?
No
> > So all cases are explained by this or by the woody-proposed-updates
> > thingy.
>
> When will the woody-proposed-updates Packages files
Hi!
> The first few are not supposed to work with 'normal' sources.list
> entries, but with 'deb
> http:///debian/dists/sarge/main/update-kernel ./'.
I see, thanks.
Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
supposed to be?
> So all cases are explained by this or by t
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Jeroen wrote:
> > woody-proposed-updates got dropped because there is no more point
> > release of woody, so the proposed-updates of it simply are no longer
> > relevant.
>
> I see. Thus, I simply have to wait until woody-proposed-up
Johann Glaser wrote:
>Hi!
>
>
>Ok, great. Lets have a look. This is the output of my script checking
>our internal mirror. It searches all "Packages" files, filters the lines
>starting with "Filename:" and checks if these files are present. For a
>few weeks it complains about these missing files:
>
Hi!
> At least some of them are of woody-proposed-updates, which got dropped
> from the database, and hence from pool. Indeed, the corresponding
> Packages.gz files on the mirrors didn't get dropped yet, which is a
> minor bug.
>
> woody-proposed-updates got dropped because there is no more poin
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Ok, great. Lets have a look. This is the output of my script checking
> our internal mirror. It searches all "Packages" files, filters the lines
> starting with "Filename:" and checks if these files are present. For a
> few weeks it c
Hi!
Am Montag, den 04.07.2005, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > For a few weeks there are discrepancies between some "Packages" files
> > and the files in the ./pool/ directory. Unfortunately the debian-mirrors
> > list is dea
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> For a few weeks there are discrepancies between some "Packages" files
> and the files in the ./pool/ directory. Unfortunately the debian-mirrors
> list is dead since the end of 2003. Therefore I try to ask this list, if
> you know anything about
> "Goswin" == Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Goswin> zsync uses the algorithm described in the rsync technical paper
Goswin> afaik. Does rsync have a patent issue? Do we realy care about some
Goswin> stupid countries patents?
My understanding is that rsync doesn'
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:05:56AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> zsync looks suspiciously like it might have similar patent issues
> which killed the rproxy project.
>
> Then again I am no expert; Please tell me I am wrong...
i'm not an expert either, but the zsync maintainer and i talked to a lot
of
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Goswin" == Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Goswin> zsync has the option of looking into gziped files and
> Goswin> rsync them as if they would be ungziped (while still just
> Goswin> downloading chunks of the gziped fil
> "Goswin" == Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Goswin> zsync has the option of looking into gziped files and
Goswin> rsync them as if they would be ungziped (while still just
Goswin> downloading chunks of the gziped file). Its a bit more
Goswin> complex algorith
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:59:20PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
> >> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
> >>
> >> It i
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:59:20PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
>> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
>>
>> It is not wanted due to rsync causing excessive server load.
>>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:59:20PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
>
> It is not wanted due to rsync causing excessive server load.
>
> If Debian would provide zsync files a zsync module
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> reply (that is what I get roughly) to the server would waste 75 hours
>> on waiting for the initial three-way handshake for a connect. And
>> another 50 hours f
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> reply (that is what I get roughly) to the server would waste 75 hours
> on waiting for the initial three-way handshake for a connect. And
> another 50 hours for the round-robin sending the name of a file a
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
>> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
>>
>> It is not wanted due to rsync causing excessive server load.
>>
> That is simply not true. This statement is
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
>
> It is not wanted due to rsync causing excessive server load.
>
That is simply not true. This statement is repeated all the time but
nobody ever was able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";
>> >> > can.
>> >> >
>> > I
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";
> >> > can.
> >> >
> > I guess mirrorer doesn't care for bandwith saving a
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050131 19:35]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> > I guess mirrorer doesn't care for bandwith saving as DpartialMirror,
> > correct me if I'm wrong.
> Currently it will always redownload the Packages/Sources files as gzip
> on every update to fix
Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Here's the result of some testing:
debpool:is fine for new pools, but recreating the whole mirror with
.deb and .udeb packages didn't work and I'm not the perl
guy who's capable of fixing it.
dak:too complicated for fire and forget
mirrorer:not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";
>> > can.
>> >
>> A note of caution:
>>
>> | 2004-04-03 (wyo) Since Debian does not change its policy to add
>> | adequate support f
Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am 30.01.2005 um 16:01 schrieb Thiemo Seufer:
>
>> Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
>>> files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
>>> currently need to switch
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";
> > can.
> >
> A note of caution:
>
> | 2004-04-03 (wyo) Since Debian does not change its policy to add
> | adequate support for rsync'ing package mirrors, I don't actively
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 05:27:11PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> Am 30.01.2005 um 16:29 schrieb Marc Haber:
>
> >On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:54:16 +0100, Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >>I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
> >>files for a complete mirro
Am 30.01.2005 um 16:01 schrieb Thiemo Seufer:
Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
get up to date packages.
Tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Debmirror is purely a mirror tool. It will download the Meta files
>> just like any other file.
>>
>> You can easily switch between mirror of equal contents but not create
>> Packages files reflecting wha
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debmirror is purely a mirror tool. It will download the Meta files
> just like any other file.
>
> You can easily switch between mirror of equal contents but not create
> Packages files reflecting what is locally available.
>
Sure? Anyway Dpartia
Hello Goswin,
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-30 21:23]:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-30 15:26]:
> >> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
> >> files for a complete mirror. Due to some ins
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Cajus,
>
> * Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-30 15:26]:
>> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
>> files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
>> currently need to switch the mirrors during
> Tried to work around this with a simple script that merges my
> packages into the local mirror and regenerates everything as
> needed. But sadly this doesn't seem to be perfect :-( The installer
> just doesn't want to get some of these packages, even if the md5's
> are correct. Switching from htt
* Marc Haber [Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:31:15 +0100]:
> example debpool, but afaik the code managing the "real" Debian archive
> is not yet published.
uh? cvs.d.o/dak has been there for a long time (not today, though ;-).
there are even debian packages in NEW and [1].
[1] http://ganneff.de/dak
Hello Cajus,
* Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-30 15:26]:
> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
> files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
> currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
> get up to date packa
Am 30.01.2005 um 16:29 schrieb Marc Haber:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:54:16 +0100, Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
currently need to switch the mirrors during ins
Am 30.01.2005 um 15:44 schrieb Aurelien Labrosse:
Cajus Pollmeier a écrit :
Hi,
I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
get up to date packa
Cajus Pollmeier a écrit :
Hi,
I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
get up to date packages.
Tried to work around this with a simple scrip
Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
> files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
> currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
> get up to date packages.
>
> Tried to w
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:54:16 +0100, Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
>files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
>currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
>get up to date pa
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:44:57 +0100, Aurelien Labrosse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you use 'dpkg-scanpackages' ? It rebuild Packages file for
>directories that contains..pakages.
dpkg-scanpackages is deprecated. The low-level tool up to the task is
apt-ftparchive. There is a number of hi
Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
> files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
> currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
> get up to date packages.
>
> Tried to work around this with
Cajus Pollmeier a écrit :
Hi,
I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release
files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I
currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to
get up to date packages.
Tried to work around this with a simple scrip
91 matches
Mail list logo
