On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:25:38AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure if the smaller size that LZMA allows is worth it if > > > it then takes a lot longer to unpack files, or if it becomes > > > impossible to do so due to memory requirements. > > > > I don't know on memory requirements. but i didn't notice any speed > > drawbacks for my personal use. > > > Last I checked, bzip2 requires a lot of memory to decompress. It's > documented in bzip2 manpage. 8MB is still a large number considering > embedded devices and Debian running on virtual machines. How about > LZMA ? > > bzip2: > Compress Decompress Decompress Corpus > Flag usage usage -s usage Size [snip] > -9 7600k 3700k 2350k 828642
2350k (+ 828642, I guess) != 8MB... The 8MB you cite is for compressing, not decompressing. [snip] regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
