Le Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:13:24AM +0200, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
>
> My understanding is, that it should be a complete overview of the source
> licenses. I do not treat generated files as source, because,
> well... they're not.
>
> They might come in the source tarball, like the autotools-generat
Sven Hoexter writes:
> The question is what should be achieved with d/copyright?
> Give just a short overview over the main parts of the package or a complete
> overview of the complete package contents?
My understanding is, that it should be a complete overview of the source
licenses. I do not
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:26:36AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Hi,
> ..and configure scripts have parts of autotools, Makefile.ins contain
> code from automake, and even compiled binaries contain stuff that
> originates from the compiler.
>
> I don't think these should be documented in debian/cop
Nikolaus Rath writes:
> My sponsor requested me to add debian/copyright entries for files in the
> generated HTML documentation. The documentation is generated by Sphinx,
> and Sphinx adds some templates and js libraries which are then covered
> (at least that's what I believe) by the Sphinx lice
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:23:01 -0400
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > I don't personally think it's interesting or relevant to record in
> > debian/copyright the license of generated files, and there is certainly
> > nothing in Policy that requires you to do this. Why do you ask?
>
>
> My sponsor reques
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:54:14 -0400
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:54:53 -0400
> > Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >
> >> I understand that a DEP5 copyright file lists licenses and copyrights
> >> for files in the debian source package directory, rather than for f
Neil Williams writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:54:53 -0400
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> I understand that a DEP5 copyright file lists licenses and copyrights
>> for files in the debian source package directory, rather than for files
>> that are installed by the generated .deb.
>>
>> Does that mea
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:54:53PM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> I understand that a DEP5 copyright file lists licenses and copyrights
>> for files in the debian source package directory, rather than for files
>> that are installed by the generated .deb.
>
>> Does that me
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:54:53PM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> I understand that a DEP5 copyright file lists licenses and copyrights
> for files in the debian source package directory, rather than for files
> that are installed by the generated .deb.
> Does that mean that files that are *generat
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:54:53 -0400
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> I understand that a DEP5 copyright file lists licenses and copyrights
> for files in the debian source package directory, rather than for files
> that are installed by the generated .deb.
>
> Does that mean that files that are *generated*
10 matches
Mail list logo
