Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> writes: > My sponsor requested me to add debian/copyright entries for files in the > generated HTML documentation. The documentation is generated by Sphinx, > and Sphinx adds some templates and js libraries which are then covered > (at least that's what I believe) by the Sphinx license rather then the > license of the documentation source files.
..and configure scripts have parts of autotools, Makefile.ins contain code from automake, and even compiled binaries contain stuff that originates from the compiler. I don't think these should be documented in debian/copyright, that'd lead to an endless list, in every single package in the archive. The copyright file should - in my opinion- document the licenses of that single package, not the licenses of itself, and everything else that is used to build it -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwm2fzgj....@balabit.hu
