On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:04:04PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i would argue then that user should use a tool called "rm", or "mv" :)
Hmm, rm -rf: read mail, really fast?
Bastian
--
One does not thank logic.
-- Sarek, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4
hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:36:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> They are already are, please review the (simple) package. For some of the
> packages that provide them (like systat) the tasks are pulled in from the
> depends:, for other packages there might be users that mig
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:00:49PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Why {c,sh}ouldn't they be implemented as cron.daily scripts in the respective
> packages?
They are already are, please review the (simple) package. For some of the
packages that provide them (like systat) the tasks are pulled in fr
[Please don't confuse my procmail with Cc's]
[http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct]
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:16, sean finney wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:00:49PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Why {c,sh}ouldn't they be implemented as cron.daily scripts in the
> > respecti
hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:00:49PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Why {c,sh}ouldn't they be implemented as cron.daily scripts in the respective
> packages?
i'd like to ack that. however, if the non-arch specific stuff (generic
cron jobs, init scripts, etc) for cron is still sufficiently comp
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:20, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> - Basic system accounting (implement in sysstat)
> - Basic logfile reporting (implemented through logcheck)
> - Basic security checks (implemented through checksecurity and Tiger)
> - Integrity file monitoring (through tr
6 matches
Mail list logo
