Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-07-02 Thread Mathieu Roy
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:07:12 -0500, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > >> > I`ll proceed in the time order of events: >

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-07-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:07:12 -0500, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: >> >I`ll proceed in the time order of events: >> > >> > Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: >> >I`

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > I`ll proceed in the time order of events: > > > > Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: > > I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out > > with a > > *** Virt

Re: Bug#197886: make still broken after 12 days

2003-06-30 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote: > I`ll proceed in the time order of events: > > Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400: > I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out > with a > *** Virtual memory exhausted. Stop > message on a perfectly valid, sane