On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:13:46PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Extracting source
> > Password: su: Authentication failure
> > Sorry.
> > pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
> > -> Aborting with an error
> > -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
> > ...
> > I guess I have to set a further s
Quoting Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> To summarize: today's sid was rather more unstable than usual
> due to shadow.
Please bash the shadow maintainers..:-)
Supposedly fixed in 4.0.12-5
There was a very transitional 4.0.12-4 during 15 minuteswhich
claimed to fix the mess with su PA
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The problem is that we are talking about sid here;
and pbuilder depends upon a functional chroot.
And you were running sid inside chroot.
To summarize: today's sid was rather more unstable than usual
due to shadow.
Sorry for my ignorance - you are pe
Hi,
>
> > I've tracked the problem down to the fact that
> > /etc/pam.d/su no longer exists with a clean install
> > since around yesterday.
> > Upgraded systems continue to work since /etc/pam.d/su
> > already exists.
>
> Nice that you found an issue. On the other hand my system was
> installe
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've tracked the problem down to the fact that
/etc/pam.d/su no longer exists with a clean install
since around yesterday.
Upgraded systems continue to work since /etc/pam.d/su
already exists.
Nice that you found an issue. On the other hand my system
Hi,
> Extracting source
> Password: su: Authentication failure
> Sorry.
> pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
> -> Aborting with an error
> -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
> ...
>
>
> I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> It is 'sudo su' ? I would
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You don't require root for the whole thing. pdebuild is perfectly
capable of running 'sudo' when appropriate.
This is what I thought, but have you read the beginning of this thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01330.html
? Esp
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:14:49AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> >
> > >>I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> > >>It is 'sudo su' ? I woul
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
It works with fakeroot, the user the build runs at is configureable in
/etc/pbuilderrc. The reason you require root for the whole thing is because of
unpacking the chroot, chrooting itself, installing build dependencies, and
purging the chroot ag
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:09:32 +0200 (CEST)
>Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>~$ sudo pbuilder update --distribution sid
>>~$ pdebuild
>[...]
>>I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
>>It i
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
> >>I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> >>It is 'sudo su' ? I would not really like this even if it is convinient.
> >
> > For /usr/bin/pdebuild, a
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ricardo Mones wrote:
I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
It is 'sudo su' ? I would not really like this even if it is convinient.
For /usr/bin/pdebuild, and invoke "sudo pdebuild".
Uhmm, why that? I do not want to run the whole p
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:09:32 +0200 (CEST)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ~$ sudo pbuilder update --distribution sid
> ~$ pdebuild
[...]
> I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> It is 'sudo su' ? I would not really like this even if it is convinien
13 matches
Mail list logo
