Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2014-01-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, On 02/01/14 19:57, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jerome BENOIT , 2013-12-27, 21:02: I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. As

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2014-01-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jerome BENOIT , 2013-12-27, 21:02: I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. As FireHOL is meant to manage iptables, it is de facto meant for li

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2014-01-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Jerome BENOIT writes ("Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any"): > On 27/12/13 21:17, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:02:49PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> Because debcheck complains. > > > > Then perhaps debcheck should be fixe

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Again, On 27/12/13 21:17, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:02:49PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> thanks for the reply. > >> On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List, > I am maintainin

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:02:49PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > thanks for the reply. > On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> Hello List, > >> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically > >> conta

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Jerome BENOIT writes: > On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: >> The package already depends on the architecture-dependent iptables, and >> is therefore uninstallable on kfreebsd. So there doesn't seem to be >> any harm to having the package be Architecture: all. > Will setting Architecture

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, thanks for the reply. On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, > >> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically >> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of >>

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello List, > I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically > contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of > my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. > As FireHOL is meant to