Jerome BENOIT <g62993...@rezozer.net> writes: > On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The package already depends on the architecture-dependent iptables, and >> is therefore uninstallable on kfreebsd. So there doesn't seem to be >> any harm to having the package be Architecture: all. > Will setting Architecture to linux-all create more harm ? It means that the archive has to store N copies of the package, where N is the number of Linux architectures, instead of just one. For a small package, this probably doesn't matter that much, but it's inefficient. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zjnm12l2....@windlord.stanford.edu
