Pascal Hakim wrote:
I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. You can
subscribe from http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/
And you can join the live discussions on #debian-webapps on irc.oftc.net :)
Let's have a nice collaborative work fellow developers!
--
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. You can
subscribe from http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/
Cheers,
Pasc
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 13:50 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > It really seems that such a list is need
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> It really seems that such a list is needed, a lot of webapp maintainers
> would be happy to have a common place to talk about that.
Definitely.
> Here is the name that sounds to be the good one, according to this thread:
>
>
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:54:07AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> >As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless
> >anyone can improve on it:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> I sent your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and retitled the bug.
>
Thanks, saves me hav
Neil McGovern wrote:
As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless
anyone can improve on it:
Ok, thanks.
I sent your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and retitled the bug.
Cheers.
--
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> >>>If interested people would think a l.d.o list
> >>>is better, that could also be nice.
> >>
> >>Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't
> >>take too long to creat
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
If interested people would think a l.d.o list
is better, that could also be nice.
Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't
take too long to create it.
It really seems that such a list is needed, a lot of webapp maintainers
would be h
> So, I'm not sure such kind of list
> will be useful for a long period. Of course, we could discuss about
> the meaning of 'long' in Debian metrics...
I disagree with that. A lot of people use webapps (through their
browser) a lot more than all the others.
I already explained my PoV about weba
su, 2005-05-01 kello 21:41 +0100, Neil McGovern kirjoitti:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I keep thinking that it should be in plural:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sean finney a écrit :
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
I agree. That cannot hurt to have a working area.
I also vote for a SVN account.
i didn't think you could do svn on alioth. can you?
Well not it depends on what you mean by "on alioth".
I know that you can reque
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:24:53PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > I think a suitable section in debian policy would be appropriate. And
> > mere technical discussions about the policy contents are also
> > appropriate in d-policy. All other technical discussions should go
> > in an alioth list. My
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:01:42AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Eh, because you believe a new lists.d.o list could take a bit of delay,
> > an alioth list is better?
> >
> > Sorry, but I don't agree with the reasoning -- lis
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:38:51PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> If I understand well, those two names could be interesting:
>
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I find the first one a little bit ugly (the "webapp" word is not that
> clean for a mailing list I think) and I also
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> I agree. That cannot hurt to have a working area.
> I also vote for a SVN account.
i didn't think you could do svn on alioth. can you?
> >so, that said, i'm going to go ahead and apply for an alioth project
> >for the packaging re
sean finney a écrit :
well, given that there will most likely result a package or two from the
discussion, as well as a policy (hopefully :), and both of which will
need some kind of working repository to which we all have access, it
would make sense to start up an alioth project anyway.
I agree.
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Eh, because you believe a new lists.d.o list could take a bit of delay,
> an alioth list is better?
>
> Sorry, but I don't agree with the reasoning -- lists.debian.org is for
> general discussion lists, while alioth is more f
If I understand well, those two names could be interesting:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I find the first one a little bit ugly (the "webapp" word is not that
clean for a mailing list I think) and I also find the second problematic
because of the word "packages".
This leads me to
Pascal Hakim a Ãcrit :
- debian-www@lists.debian.org
err... you're kidding right?
Hmmm.. he he :)
Sorry for that stupid mistake!
--
Alexis Sukrieh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:08 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > >Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
> > >provide people with a place to discuss the packaging of web-a
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> So let's find a name, here are some ideas I have "on the fly", feel free
> to comment on it:
>
>- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ugly name IMHO. But then again, who am I to say you shouldn't be using
an ugly name? ;-)
>- debian-www@li
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 14:28 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar a Ãcrit :
> > I'm strongly in favour of a lists.debian.org, and I'm sure it'll be
> > created swiftly when we choose a sane name for it.
>
> If possible, I also think that a lists.debian.org is better, and will
> und
Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
I'm strongly in favour of a lists.debian.org, and I'm sure it'll be
created swiftly when we choose a sane name for it.
If possible, I also think that a lists.debian.org is better, and will
underline the fact that a real coordination is needed around webapp
packages
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:08:01PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > >Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
> > >provide people with a place to discuss the packaging o
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Pascal Hakim wrote:
> >Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
> >provide people with a place to discuss the packaging of web-apps, as
> >well as standard things associated with it is a great idea. It's
Pascal Hakim wrote:
Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
provide people with a place to discuss the packaging of web-apps, as
well as standard things associated with it is a great idea. It's better
than debian-apache (after all, there's other web servers out there),
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 10:14 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:28:48PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
> > be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
> > subscribers are
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:28:48PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
> be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
> subscribers are usually pretty clued-in and interested. Perhaps it is
> the natural place to
I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
subscribers are usually pretty clued-in and interested. Perhaps it is
the natural place to discuss web-apps? At least until traffic is
sufficient that the Debian A
This one time, at band camp, Alexis Sukrieh said:
> Neil McGovern a écrit :
>
> >To do this, it would be a good idea IMO to have a maining list. This has
> >already been suggested[1][2], and I agree that a debian-webapp list
> >should be created.
>
> I also think this is a good idea. Several time
Neil McGovern a écrit :
To do this, it would be a good idea IMO to have a maining list. This has
already been suggested[1][2], and I agree that a debian-webapp list
should be created.
I also think this is a good idea. Several times in the past I'd loved to
mail such a mailing list when I faced web
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:00:18PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > There's been a bit of discussion[0] recently on the debian-security list
> > with regards to how include()ed files should be handled.
>
> and this for the most part is
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> There's been a bit of discussion[0] recently on the debian-security list
> with regards to how include()ed files should be handled.
and this for the most part is a good practice. if the file does not
need to be directly accessed by
Hi all,
There's been a bit of discussion[0] recently on the debian-security list
with regards to how include()ed files should be handled.
I think that, due to the large number of packages that are webapps, a
policy shoudl be created on how we handle these.
To do this, it would be a good idea IMO
33 matches
Mail list logo
