Re: License of a patch

2010-09-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Christian Kastner writes: > On 08/30/2010 09:06 PM, D M German wrote: >> >> After my presentation at DebConf this year I was pointed to your efforts >> on the Patch Tagging Guidelines. >> >> One thing I believe would be useful is if the patch included a >> license. The simplest license would b

Re: License of a patch

2010-09-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, D M German wrote: > After my presentation at DebConf this year I was pointed to your efforts > on the Patch Tagging Guidelines. > > One thing I believe would be useful is if the patch included a > license. The simplest license would be "Same as patched code" but it >

Re: License of a patch

2010-08-31 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
On 30.08.2010 21:06, D M German wrote: After my presentation at DebConf this year I was pointed to your efforts on the Patch Tagging Guidelines. One thing I believe would be useful is if the patch included a license. The simplest license would be "Same as patched code" but it will clarify it.

Re: License of a patch

2010-08-30 Thread Christian Kastner
On 08/30/2010 09:06 PM, D M German wrote: > > After my presentation at DebConf this year I was pointed to your efforts > on the Patch Tagging Guidelines. > > One thing I believe would be useful is if the patch included a > license. The simplest license would be "Same as patched code" but it > wi

License of a patch

2010-08-30 Thread D M German
After my presentation at DebConf this year I was pointed to your efforts on the Patch Tagging Guidelines. One thing I believe would be useful is if the patch included a license. The simplest license would be "Same as patched code" but it will clarify it. Similarly, but perhaps more complex, it